Literature DB >> 9514221

Relationship between bone density and osteoarthritis in a skeletal population from London.

M Brickley1, T Waldron.   

Abstract

To determine whether bone density was related to the presence of osteoarthritis in past populations, bone density was determined directly on bone slices taken from the fourth lumbar vertebra of a series of skeletons from a cemetery in London used from the middle 18th to the early 19th centuries. Eighty male and 57 female skeletons were studied and standard anthropological methods were used to determine age and gender. Osteoarthritis was diagnosed by the presence of eburnation on joint surfaces. The mean bone density in the males was 0.351 (+/-0.071) g/cm2, and in the females 0.332 (+/-0.091); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.045). There was a significant, negative relationship with bone density and age in females (p = 0.0023), but not males (p = 0.073). Forty-seven of the males and 30 of the females had osteoarthritis, the most commonly affected joints being the facet joints of the spine and the hands. For the males there was no significant difference in bone density in those with or without osteoarthritis, but in females the bone density was significantly lower (p = 0.021) in those with osteoarthritis than in those without. The reasons why this result differs from modern populations in which patients with osteoarthritis tend to have higher bone density are discussed, and it is suggested that the most plausible explanation may relate to differences in nutritional status between past and modern populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514221     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00272-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  2 in total

1.  Periarticular osteophytes as an appendicular joint stress marker (JSM): analysis in a contemporary Japanese skeletal collection.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tsurumoto; Kazunobu Saiki; Keishi Okamoto; Takeshi Imamura; Junichiro Maeda; Yoshitaka Manabe; Tetsuaki Wakebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Bone-formers and bone-losers in an archaeological population.

Authors:  Simon Mays
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.868

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.