Literature DB >> 9513907

A randomized study comparing methylprednisolone plus chlorambucil versus methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

C Ponticelli1, P Altieri, F Scolari, P Passerini, D Roccatello, B Cesana, P Melis, B Valzorio, M Sasdelli, S Pasquali, C Pozzi, G Piccoli, A Lupo, S Segagni, F Antonucci, M Dugo, M Minari, A Scalia, L Pedrini, G Pisano, C Grassi, M Farina, R Bellazzi.   

Abstract

To assess whether chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide may have a better therapeutic index in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, we compared two regimens based on a 6-mo treatment, alternating every other month methylprednisolone with chlorambucil or methylprednisolone with cyclophosphamide. Patients with biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy and with a nephrotic syndrome were randomized to be given methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously for 3 consecutive days followed by oral methylprednisolone, 0.4 mg/kg per d for 27 d) alternated every other month either with chlorambucil (0.2 mg/kg per d for 30 d) or cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg per d for 30 d). The whole treatment lasted 6 mo; 3 mo with corticosteroids and 3 mo with one cytotoxic drug. Among 87 patients followed for at least 1 yr, 36 of 44 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.3 to 91.8%) assigned to methylprednisolone and chlorambucil entered complete or partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome, versus 40 of 43 (93%; 95% CI, 80.9 to 98.5%) assigned to methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide (P = 0.116). Of patients who attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome, 11 of 36 in the chlorambucil group (30.5%) and 10 of 40 in the cyclophosphamide group (25%) had a relapse of the nephrotic syndrome between 6 and 30 mo. The reciprocal of plasma creatinine improved in the cohort groups followed for 1 yr for both treatment groups (P < 0.01) and remained unchanged when compared with basal values in the cohort groups followed for 2 and 3 yr. Six patients in the chlorambucil group and two in the cyclophosphamide group did not complete the treatment because of side effects. Four patients in the chlorambucil group but none in the cyclophosphamide group suffered from herpes zoster. One patient per group developed cancer. It is concluded that in nephrotic patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy both treatments may be effective in favoring remission and in preserving renal function for at least 3 yr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9513907     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V93444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  88 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes in idiopathic membranous nephropathy using a restrictive treatment strategy.

Authors:  Jan A J G van den Brand; Peter R van Dijk; Julia M Hofstra; Jack F M Wetzels
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.801

3.  M-type phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibodies and renal function in patients with primary membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Elion Hoxha; Sigrid Harendza; Hans Pinnschmidt; Ulf Panzer; Rolf A K Stahl
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Hocine Tighiouart; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort; Andrew L Simon; Jian Ying; Gerald J Beck; Christoph Wanner; Jürgen Floege; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Vlado Perkovic; Edward F Vonesh; Tom Greene
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Long-term outcomes of initial therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Masayo Sato; Takashi Takei; Takahito Moriyama; Mitsuyo Itabashi; Kosaku Nitta
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 6.  Treatment of membranous nephropathy: time for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Piero Ruggenenti; Fernando C Fervenza; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Patients with primary membranous nephropathy are at high risk of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Taewoo Lee; Vimal K Derebail; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Yunro Chung; Jason P Fine; Shannon Mahoney; Caroline J Poulton; Sophia Lionaki; Susan L Hogan; Ronald J Falk; Daniel C Cattran; Michelle Hladunewich; Heather N Reich; Patrick H Nachman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Authors:  Yizhi Chen; Arrigo Schieppati; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen; Javier Zamora; Giovanni A Giuliano; Norbert Braun; Annalisa Perna
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  [Treatment of glomerulonephritis].

Authors:  T Risler; N Braun; C M Erley
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Membranous nephropathy in children: clinical presentation and therapeutic approach.

Authors:  Shina Menon; Rudolph P Valentini
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.