Literature DB >> 9513626

Survey assessment of methadone treatment services as reinforcers.

M A Chutuape1, K Silverman, M L Stitzer.   

Abstract

Offering incentives contingent on behavioral change can be an effective method for improving treatment outcome in methadone maintenance. Further, there are several incentives available within the daily operation of methadone clinics that can be used in this way. This study describes patient preferences for clinic service incentives as identified by three types of survey methodologies: multiple choice procedures, visual analog scales, and rank ordering. Methadone patients (n = 111) rated preference for three service incentives (take-home medication, dose increase, counseling sessions) using each survey. Mean and individual responses were highly consistent across surveys and indicated that, in general, take-homes were the most preferred, followed by dose increases and then counseling. The rank order survey also assessed an additional 18 service items (e.g., rent, food or gas payments; employment assistance; medical care). Consistent with other measures, most patients (64%) placed take-homes within their top five rankings, indicating a high level of preference, but this survey also revealed wide individual differences in preference ranking. The surveys described can be used to identify preferred incentives for clinic-wide use in contingency management programs or can be used to select individualized incentives for each patient. This is useful information for maximizing utilization of clinic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9513626     DOI: 10.3109/00952999809001695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse        ISSN: 0095-2990            Impact factor:   3.829


  16 in total

1.  A tale of two cities: financing two voucher programs for substance abusers through community donations.

Authors:  Leslie Amass; Jonathan Kamien
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Facilitating the adoption of contingency management for the treatment of substance use disorders.

Authors:  John M Roll; Gregory J Madden; Richard Rawson; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2009

3.  Randomized trial of prize-based reinforcement density for simultaneous abstinence from cocaine and heroin.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; David H Epstein; John Schmittner; Massoud Vahabzadeh; Jia-Ling Lin; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  A review of human drug self-administration procedures.

Authors:  Jermaine D Jones; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students.

Authors:  Leon H Butler; Jessica G Irons; Drew T Bassett; Christopher J Correia
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-06

6.  Conventional and unconventional treatments for stress among methadone-maintained patients: treatment willingness and perceived efficacy.

Authors:  Declan T Barry; Mark Beitel; Timothy Breuer; Christopher J Cutter; Jonathan Savant; Richard S Schottenfeld; Bruce J Rounsaville
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2010-12-28

7.  Disseminating contingency management: impacts of staff training and implementation at an opiate treatment program.

Authors:  Bryan Hartzler; T Ron Jackson; Brinn E Jones; Blair Beadnell; Donald A Calsyn
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-12-21

Review 8.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 10.  Recent advances in the treatment of opiate addiction.

Authors:  Paul J Fudala; George W Woody
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.