Literature DB >> 9513306

Proposed catheter standards for pharyngeal manofluorography (videomanometry)

J R Salassa1, K R DeVault, F M McConnel.   

Abstract

With the recent introduction of commercially available pharyngeal manofluorography systems, catheter design should be standardized. Catheters of different designs can produce different data because of their design characteristics. A standard catheter design should make results between investigators comparable and facilitate acceptable normal values. The authors' combined laboratory experience with many catheter designs was reviewed and the literature consulted. For pharyngeal manofluorography, the proposed standard catheter should be 2 x 4 mm in diameter, ovoid, and 100 cm long. The catheter should be marked in centimeters with an anterior and posterior orientation. There should be a slightly malleable, 3- to 4-cm length without sensors beyond the most distal sensor. Solid state transducer sensors should be three or four in number and placed in the pharyngoesophageal segment, midhypopharynx, and tongue base (esophagus for fourth sensor). Sensor spacing should be 3 cm, except 2 cm between the midhypopharynx and tongue base. Unidirectional, in-line, posteriorly oriented sensors with the option of a single circumferential sensor in the cricopharyngeus are currently preferred over circumferential sensors because of their small diameter (patient comfort).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9513306     DOI: 10.1007/PL00009553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  11 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with head turn and chin tuck.

Authors:  Timothy M McCulloch; Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Timing of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressures as a function of normal and effortful swallowing in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Susan G Hiss; Maggie Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Rehabilitation after treatment for jugular foramen lesions.

Authors:  A D Cheesman; Annette M Kelly
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-01

4.  Pharyngeal pressures during swallowing within and across three sessions: within-subject variance and order effects.

Authors:  Phoebe R Macrae; Daniel J Myall; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The effects of aspiration status, liquid type, and bolus volume on pharyngeal peak pressure in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; Erika Wilhelm; Catherine Rees; Jeff Williamson; Stephen Kritchevsky
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Differential Response Pattern of Oropharyngeal Pressure by Bolus and Dry Swallows.

Authors:  Mana Hasegawa; Masayuki Kurose; Keiichiro Okamoto; Yoshiaki Yamada; Takanori Tsujimura; Makoto Inoue; Taisuke Sato; Takatsune Narumi; Noritaka Fujii; Kensuke Yamamura
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  The influence of orolingual pressure on the timing of pharyngeal pressure events.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Maggie Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Electrical bioimpedance measurement as a tool for dysphagia visualisation.

Authors:  Chris J Chester; Paul T Gaynor; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2014-09-25

10.  Intraoral pressure patterns during swallowing.

Authors:  Petra Santander; Wilfried Engelke; Arno Olthoff; Christiane Völter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.