Literature DB >> 9512458

Uptake and catabolism of modified LDL in scavenger-receptor class A type I/II knock-out mice.

T J Van Berkel1, A Van Velzen, J K Kruijt, H Suzuki, T Kodama.   

Abstract

The liver is the major organ responsible for the uptake of modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) from the blood circulation, with endothelial and Kupffer cells as major cellular uptake sites. Scavenger-receptors, which include various classes, are held responsible for this uptake. Mice deficient in scavenger-receptor class A types I and II were created and the fate of acetylated LDL (Ac-LDL) in vivo and its interaction with liver endothelial, Kupffer and peritoneal macrophages was characterized. Surprisingly, the decay in vivo (t12 < 2 min), tissue distribution and liver uptake (at 5 min it was 77.4 +/- 4.6% of the injected dose) of Ac-LDL in the knock-out mice were not significantly different from control mice (t12 < 2 min and liver uptake 79.1 +/- 4.6% of the injected dose). A separation of mice liver cells into parenchymal, endothelial and Kupffer cells 10 min after injection of Ac-LDL indicated that in both control and knock-out mice the liver endothelial cells were responsible for more than 70% of the liver uptake. Both in control and knock-out mice, preinjection of polyinosinic acid (poly I, 200 microg) completely blocked the liver uptake, indicating that both in control and knock-out mice the scavenger-receptors are sensitive to poly I. Preinjection of suboptimal poly I concentrations (20 and 50 microg) provided evidence that the serum decay and liver uptake of Ac-LDL is more readily inhibited in the knock-out mice as compared with the control mice, indicating less efficient removal of Ac-LDL in vivo in the knock-out mice under these conditions. Studies in vitro with isolated liver endothelial and Kupffer cells from knock-out mice indicate that the cell association of Ac-LDL during 2 h at 37 degrees C is 50 and 53% of the control, respectively, whereas the degradation reaches values of 58 and 63%. For peritoneal macrophages from knock-out mice the cell association of Ac-LDL was identical to the control mice whereas the Ac-LDL degradation in cells from the knock-out mice was 17% of the control. The low degradation capacity of peritoneal macrophages from knock-out mice for Ac-LDL indicates that scavenger-receptor class A types I and II play a quantitative important role in the degradation of Ac-LDL by macrophages. In liver, the contribution of scavenger-receptor class A types I and II to the maximal uptake and degradation of Ac-LDL by endothelial and Kupffer cells was 40-50%. Binding studies performed at 4 degrees C indicate that the lower rates of degradation are due to a lower number of surface receptors on the cells from the knock-out mice. From the in vitro and in vivo data it can be concluded that in addition to the classic scavenger-receptors class A types I and II liver does contain additional novel poly I-sensitive scavenger-receptors that facilitate efficient removal of Ac-LDL from the blood circulation. The availability of the scavenger-receptor class A types I and II knock-out mice will stimulate further molecular identification of these receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9512458      PMCID: PMC1219317          DOI: 10.1042/bj3310029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  38 in total

1.  Separation of plasma lipoproteins by density-gradient ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  T G Redgrave; D C Roberts; C E West
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1975-05-12       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  Degradation of cationized low density lipoprotein and regulation of cholesterol metabolism in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fibroblasts.

Authors:  S K Basu; J L Goldstein; G W Anderson; M S Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Lactosylated low density lipoprotein: a potential carrier for the site-specific delivery of drugs to Kupffer cells.

Authors:  M K Bijsterbosch; G J Ziere; T J Van Berkel
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Lipoprotein uptake and metabolism by rat aortic smooth muscle cells in tissue culture.

Authors:  E L Bierman; O Stein; Y Stein
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Characterization of a receptor for oxidized low-density lipoproteins on rat Kupffer cells: similarity to macrosialin.

Authors:  A G Van Velzen; R P Da Silva; S Gordon; T J Van Berkel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  CD36 is a receptor for oxidized low density lipoprotein.

Authors:  G Endemann; L W Stanton; K S Madden; C M Bryant; R T White; A A Protter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Malondialdehyde alteration of low density lipoproteins leads to cholesteryl ester accumulation in human monocyte-macrophages.

Authors:  A M Fogelman; I Shechter; J Seager; M Hokom; J S Child; P A Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Different fate in vivo of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein and acetylated low density lipoprotein in rats. Recognition by various scavenger receptors on Kupffer and endothelial liver cells.

Authors:  T J Van Berkel; Y B De Rijke; J K Kruijt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Rat liver Kupffer and endothelial cells express different binding proteins for modified low density lipoproteins. Kupffer cells express a 95-kDa membrane protein as a specific binding site for oxidized low density lipoproteins.

Authors:  Y B de Rijke; T J van Berkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Binding of acetylated low density lipoprotein and maleylated bovine serum albumin to the rat liver: one or two receptors?

Authors:  H A Dresel; E Friedrich; D P Via; H Sinn; R Ziegler; G Schettler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and stabilins in elimination of oxidized low-density lipoproteins.

Authors:  Ruomei Li; Ana Oteiza; Karen Kristine Sørensen; Peter McCourt; Randi Olsen; Bård Smedsrød; Dmitri Svistounov
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  The physiological scavenger receptor function of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial and Kupffer cells is independent of scavenger receptor class A type I and II.

Authors:  Berit Hansen; Beatriz Arteta; Bård Smedsrød
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Age-related changes in scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis in rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Jaione Simon-Santamaria; Ivana Malovic; Alessandra Warren; Ana Oteiza; David Le Couteur; Bård Smedsrød; Peter McCourt; Karen Kristine Sørensen
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  The role of the macrophage scavenger receptor in immune stimulation by bacterial DNA and synthetic oligonucleotides.

Authors:  F G Zhu; C F Reich; D S Pisetsky
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Modulation of plasma protein binding and in vivo liver cell uptake of phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides by cholesterol conjugation.

Authors:  M K Bijsterbosch; E T Rump; R L De Vrueh; R Dorland; R van Veghel; K L Tivel; E A Biessen; T J van Berkel; M Manoharan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Endocytic uptake of advanced glycation end products by mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is mediated by a scavenger receptor distinct from the macrophage scavenger receptor class A.

Authors:  K Matsumoto; H Sano; R Nagai; H Suzuki; T Kodama; M Yoshida; S Ueda; B Smedsrød; S Horiuchi
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 7.  Prominent Receptors of Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells in Liver Homeostasis and Disease.

Authors:  Ekta Pandey; Aiah S Nour; Edward N Harris
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Highly upregulated expression of CD36 and MSR1 in circulating monocytes of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Michal Piechota; Anna Banaszewska; Joanna Dudziak; Marek Slomczynski; Robert Plewa
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Evaluation of GalNAc-siRNA Conjugate Activity in Pre-clinical Animal Models with Reduced Asialoglycoprotein Receptor Expression.

Authors:  Jennifer L S Willoughby; Amy Chan; Alfica Sehgal; James S Butler; Jayaprakash K Nair; Tim Racie; Svetlana Shulga-Morskaya; Tuyen Nguyen; Kun Qian; Kristina Yucius; Klaus Charisse; Theo J C van Berkel; Muthiah Manoharan; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Martin A Maier; Vasant Jadhav; Tracy S Zimmermann
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 11.454

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.