Literature DB >> 9511837

Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.

H Forss1, E Halme.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the retention and caries preventive efficacy of glass ionomer (Fuji III; GIC) and light-cured resin-based (Delton; LCR) fissure sealants. One hundred and sixty-six 5-14-year-old schoolchildren received sealants on their newly erupted first or second molars; a split mouth design was used. Previously reported 2-year results showed low retention rates for GIC sealants, but no difference in the caries increment between the groups. The same persons were invited to a dental check-up 6.1 to 7.8 (mean 7.1) years after the application of sealants; 111 persons (66.8% of the original group) participated in the study. The retention of sealants, and the caries status of occlusal surfaces and adjacent proximal surfaces was recorded. On the sealed occlusal surfaces, 10% of GIC and 45% of LCR sealants were totally and 9% of GIC and 20% of LCR sealants partially present. Twenty-three (23.5%) of the occlusal surfaces sealed with GIC and 16 (16.5%) of those sealed with LCR were carious or filled. Compared to LCR sealants, the effectiveness of GIC sealants was -44% (95% CI -71%, -16%) and net gain -7% (95% CI -18%, 4%). The relative risk of caries occurring was 1.44 (95% CI 0.96, 2.14).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9511837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  9 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of three fissure sealants: 24 month follow-up.

Authors:  W Dukic; D Glavina
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-09

2.  The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.

Authors:  T Ulusu; M E Odabaş; T Tüzüner; O Baygin; H Sillelioğlu; C Deveci; F G Gökdoğan; A Altuntaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements versus resin-based materials as fissure sealants: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  V Yengopal; S Mickenautsch
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Anneli Ahovuo-Saloranta; Helena Forss; Tanya Walsh; Anne Nordblad; Marjukka Mäkelä; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

5.  Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-01-28

6.  Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant in children with special needs.

Authors:  Mariana C Morales-Chávez; Zacy-Carola Nualart-Grollmus
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-12-01

7.  Effectiveness of audiovisual distraction in behavior modification during dental caries assessment and sealant placement in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Kausar Sadia Fakhruddin; Hisham Yehia El Batawi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 May-Jun

Review 8.  Pit and Fissure Sealant versus Fluoride Varnish for the Prevention of Dental Caries in School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tasneem Rashed; Nura Alkhalefa; Alaa Adam; Abdulaziz AlKheraif
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.149

9.  Dental Sealants: Knowledge, Value, Opinion, and Practice among Dental Professionals of Bathinda City, India.

Authors:  Kailash Asawa; Vivek V Gupta; Mridula Tak; Ramesh Nagarajappa; Pulkit Chaturvedi; Salil Bapat; Prashant Mishra; Santanu Sen Roy
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2014-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.