Literature DB >> 9510351

Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease.

A V D'Amico1, M Schnall, R Whittington, S B Malkowicz, D Schultz, J E Tomaszewski, A Wein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) has been reported to improve the prediction of pathologic Stage T3 disease in patients with clinical Stage T1,2 disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10 to 20 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 7 or less, and at least 50% of the biopsy specimens positive from a sextant sampling. This study examines the performance characteristics of the erMRI to predict established extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and PSA failure-free survival (bNED) in this subgroup.
METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of the erMRI to predict established ECE and SVI were calculated in the proposed subgroup. PSA failure-free survival stratified by the erMRI-defined stage was estimated by using the method of Kaplan and Meier.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy to predict established ECE and SVI in clinical Stage T1,2 patients was 65%, 100%, 100%, 79%, and 84%, respectively. No patient would have been excluded from surgery on the basis of a false-positive study. Moreover, the percent of patients with pathologic organ-confined disease would have increased from 32% to 61%, and the 3-year bNED rate would have increased from 12% to 45% (P = 0.07) if only patients with erMRI Stage T2 disease were selected for surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The erMRI may significantly improve the identification of established ECE and SVI in select patients with prostate cancer preoperatively. Further study of the erMRI in these select patients is warranted and ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9510351     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00630-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

1.  Accuracy of preoperative endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinical under-staging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alessandro Borsato; Mario Romano; Teodoro Sava; Claudio Ghimenton; Filippo Migliorini; Carmelo Monaco; Emanuele Rubilotta; Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli; Vincenzo Lacola; Stefania Montemezzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Newly developed surface coil for endoluminal MRI, depiction of pig gastric wall layers and vascular architecture in ex vivo study.

Authors:  Yoshinori Morita; Hiromu Kutsumi; Hayato Yoshinaka; Yuichiro Matsuoka; Kagayaki Kuroda; Masakazu Gotanda; Naomi Sekino; Etsuko Kumamoto; Masaru Yoshida; Hideto Inokuchi; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dima Raskolnikov; Arvin K George; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Nabeel A Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Jason T Rothwax; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Sandeep Sankineni; Daniel Su; Lambros Stamatakis; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Chemoprevention strategies in the prostate: an overview.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; Howard R Higley; Michael K Brawer; M Scott Lucia; Caroline C Sigman; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

6.  Prostate cancer: serum and tissue markers.

Authors:  G J Miller; M K Brawer; W A Sakr; J B Thrasher; R Townsend
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

7.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Endoluminal MR imaging of porcine gastric structure in vivo.

Authors:  Hayato Yoshinaka; Yoshinori Morita; Yuichiro Matsuoka; Daisuke Obata; Shoko Fujiwara; Ryo Chinzei; Maki Sugimoto; Tsuyoshi Sanuki; Masaru Yoshida; Hideto Inokuchi; Etsuko Kumamoto; Kagayaki Kuroda; Takeshi Azuma; Hiromu Kutsumi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  Current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography fusion software platforms for guidance of prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Andrew Gomella; Hayet Amalou; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Ming-Hui Chen; Robert V Mulkern; Fiona M Fennessy; Anthony V D'Amico; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.