Literature DB >> 9510275

Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in aortic surgery: a randomized trial.

R J Valentine1, M L Duke, M H Inman, P A Grayburn, R T Hagino, H B Kakish, G P Clagett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the routine use of pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) in patients who undergo aortic surgery.
METHODS: One hundred twenty patients were randomized to placement of PACs for perioperative monitoring and hemodynamic optimization (tune up) in the intensive care unit on the night before aortic operation, or to intravenous hydration in the ward and perioperative monitoring without PACs. Before randomization, all patients underwent routine adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy.
RESULTS: To meet predetermined endpoints, 30 PAC patients (50%) received nitrates, inotropic agents, or both. PAC patients received more fluid in the preoperative period (p < 0.001) and in the first 24 hours after operation (p = 0.002) than control subjects. Eleven PAC patients (18%) and three control subjects (5%) had adverse intraoperative events (p = 0.02). There were 20 adverse postoperative events in 15 PAC patients (25%; nine cardiac, seven pulmonary, four acute tubular necrosis), which was not different compared with 11 postoperative events in 10 control subjects (17%; five cardiac, five pulmonary, one acute tubular necrosis). There were also no differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, or hospital stay between groups. Postoperative cardiac complications were more common among patients who had a history of congestive heart failure (p = 0.02; odds ratio, 3.75; confidence interval, 1.3 to 11) or reperfusion defects on adenosine thallium scintigraphy (p = 0.01; odds ratio, 3.4; confidence interval, 1.2 to 9.4), regardless of group.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of PACs for perioperative monitoring with the above protocol during aortic surgery is not beneficial and may be associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications. Preoperative tune up does not prevent postoperative cardiac, renal, and other complications. Variables such as cardiac risk factors and adenosine thallium scintigraphy may be more important predictors of cardiac events in patients who undergo aortic operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9510275     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70351-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  29 in total

1.  A computer program for interpreting pulmonary artery catheterization data: results of the European HEMODYN Resident Study.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Etienne Fourquet; Luc Jacquet; Alain Broccard; Thomas Uhlig; Andrew Rhodes; Jan Bakker; Claude Perret
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Pulmonary artery catheter in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine].

Authors:  U Schirmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Our study 20 years on: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Owen Boyd; R Michael Grounds
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariateresa Giglio; Lidia Dalfino; Filomena Puntillo; Giovanni Rubino; Massimo Marucci; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-24

9.  Swan-Ganz catheter use in trauma patients can be reduced without negatively affecting outcomes.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Kenji Inaba; Chrysanthos Georgiou; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Linda S Chan; Demetrios Demetriades; Randall Friese; Peter Rhee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Lees; Mark Hamilton; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.