Literature DB >> 9509976

G-CSF administration following peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft in lymphoid malignancies: evidence for clinical benefits and reduction of treatment costs.

C Tarella1, C Castellino, F Locatelli, D Caracciolo, P Corradini, M Falda, A Novarino, V Tassi, A Pileri.   

Abstract

Clinical value and costs of G-CSF administration following autograft with mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were evaluated in two sequential groups of 20 patients each, treated for lymphoid neoplasms in the period February 1993 to January 1996. One group was given G-CSF (Filgrastim) (5 microg/kg/day), starting on day +1 until ANC was > 500/microl, the other received no G-CSF. All patients were conditioned with mitoxantrone 60 mg/m2 + L-PAM 180 mg/m2 and received large numbers of PBPC (median of 12 and 13 x 10(6) CD34+/kg, respectively). The median time to ANC > 500/microl was 10 days in the G-CSF group vs 14 days in controls (P < 0.0001). G-CSF was associated with a slightly faster platelet recovery (11 vs 13 days to plts > 20000/microl, P = 0.09). Median duration of fever (2.5 vs 5 days, P = 0.028), nonprophylactic antibiotics (8 vs 11 days, P = 0.019), and post-transplant hospitalization (13 vs 16 days, P = 0.0028) were also significantly reduced. The average cost per treatment in the G-CSF group amounted to about US$18241 as compared to US$21868 in the control group, implying a cost reduction of approximately 16%. Thus, G-CSF reduced morbidity with cost containment, supporting its use even if autograft is performed with large quantities of PBPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9509976     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  5 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: economics of high-dose therapy.

Authors:  Stephen M Beard; Lucy Wall; Louise Gaffney; Fiona Sampson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Use of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in high-dose cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paolo Anderlini; Richard Champlin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Early versus late administration of pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  C Kahl; H G Sayer; A Hinke; M Freund; J Casper
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Economic evaluations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Marc Esser; Helmut Brunner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Qixiang Ye; Hebi Jiang; Hua Jiang
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.638

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.