Literature DB >> 9509085

Improved emergency department efficiency with a three-tier trauma triage system.

L J Kaplan1, T A Santora, C A Blank-Reid, S Z Trooskin.   

Abstract

This pilot study was carried out to determine whether converting from a two-tier to a three-tier in-hospital trauma triage system improves the efficiency of emergency department (ED) care and minimizes inappropriate triage. Patients at an urban, Level 1 trauma centre were triaged using either a two-tier (months 1-3; n = 197) or three-tier (months 4-6; n = 240) trauma response system. Patients were assessed for triage type, age, sex, injury severity score, Glasgow coma score, post-ED disposition, total ED time, survival, complication rate, probability of survival and unexpected death. Comparisons were made by ANOVA table analysis; significance was assumed for p < 0.05. Two-tier (n = 197) and three-tier patients (n = 240) were matched with respect to mean age, sex, mean injury severity score, mean Glasgow coma score, post-ED disposition, survival and probability of survival. Two-tier patients were triaged to give 20% alerts [criteria = physiological derangement (PD) and/or injury mechanism (MOI)] and 80% consults; three-tier patients were triaged as 20% category I (criteria = PD), 18% category II (criteria = MOI) and 62% consults. Total ED time decreased from two-tier (3.98 +/- 2.81 h) to three-tier triage (3.53 +/- 2.14 h, p = 0.001). There was no difference between two-tier alert and three-tier category I times (2.09 +/- 1.64 vs. 1.95 +/- 1.75 h; p = 0.72). Category II patients (3.28 +/- 1.98 h; p = 0.009) spent less time in the ED than did two-tier consults (4.36 +/- 2.65 h). The mean ED three-tier consult time significantly decreased as well (3.95 +/- 2.42 h, p = 0.008 vs. two-tier consult). Complications per patient were unchanged from two-tier to three-tier triage (0.17 +/- 0.52 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.48; p = 0.15). Under-triage (5%) and over-triage (7.5%) were minimal under three-tier triage. It is concluded that using a three-tier triage system results in an increase in the early involvement of the trauma service while decreasing emergency department time and minimizing over-triage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9509085     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activation

Authors:  Kevin Verhoeff; Rachelle Saybel; Vanessa Fawcett; Bonnie Tsang; Pamela Mathura; Sandy Widder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Criteria for level 1 and level 2 trauma codes: Are pelvic ring injuries undertriaged?

Authors:  Brittany E Haws; Scott Wuertzer; Laura Raffield; Leon Lenchik; Anna N Miller
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-08-18

Review 3.  [Personnel and structural requirements for the shock trauma room management of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  C A Kühne; S Ruchholtz; S Sauerland; C Waydhas; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Scoring systems in trauma.

Authors:  R Kingston; S J O'Flanagan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Trauma team activation varies across Dutch emergency departments: a national survey.

Authors:  Rolf E Egberink; Harm-Jan Otten; Maarten J IJzerman; Arie B van Vugt; Carine J M Doggen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.