Literature DB >> 9507817

Ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi.

M D Fabrizio1, A Behari, D H Bagley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine its potential role in stone therapy, we evaluated our experience with the ureteroscopic removal of intrarenal calculi in 100 patients. We review the indications, techniques, stone-free and overall success rates, and complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1994 to December 1996 ureteroscopic stone removal was attempted in 100 patients a mean of 52 years old who had renal calculi. Indications for treatment included concurrent ureteral stones in 56 cases, and failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, medical or percutaneous management as well as obesity and anatomical anomalies. There were 2 or more calculi in the affected kidney in 68 patients and stones greater than 6 mm. in 67. Treatment of intrarenal calculi was performed with flexible ureteroscopes, a laser or electrohydraulic lithotriptor and endoscopic graspers. The number and size of calculi were noted in each patient. Stone-free and overall success rates defined as 1 residual fragment less than 3 mm. were noted at 1 and 3-month followup visits.
RESULTS: The overall success rate was 89%. Ureteroscopic treatment of intrarenal calculi resulted in a 77% stone-free rate. Of the 23 patients with residual calculi 12 (52%) had a single residual fragment less than 3 mm. The targeted stone was removed or fragmented in 98 patients (98%) and no ureteral calculi remained postoperatively. As expected, the number and size of the original stones inversely correlated with the success rate. There were no intraoperative complications, and only 3 urinary tract infections and 3 fevers were noted postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of smaller diameter ureteroscopes, better working instruments and more effective lithotriptors allow calculi in all parts of the collecting system to be engaged and treated. Success rates throughout the whole collecting system are comparable to if not better than those of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9507817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters.

Authors:  Kymora B Scotland; Tadeusz Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace; Ben H Chew
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of flexible ureterorenoscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for moderately size lower-pole stones.

Authors:  Abdullah Armagan; Tuna Karatag; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Ismail Basibuyuk; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm.

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Lutfi Tunc; Cagri Guneri; Ali Unsal; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  [Combined flexible and semirigid ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. Alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy of complex EWSL refractory nephrolithiasis].

Authors:  A K Ebert; W Schafhauser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The effect of short-term preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones.

Authors:  Min Ho Lee; In Jae Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Sang Chul Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm.

Authors:  Saeed M Al-Qahtani; Sixtina Gil-Deiz-de-Medina; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-06-09

8.  Predictive factors for flexible ureterorenoscopy requirement after rigid ureterorenoscopy in cases with renal pelvic stones sized 1 to 2 cm.

Authors:  Evren Süer; Ömer Gülpinar; Cihat Özcan; Çağatay Göğüş; Seymur Kerimov; Mut Şafak
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-02-02

9.  Ureteroscopy in patients with spinal cord injury: outcomes from a spinal injury unit and a review of literature.

Authors:  Sarah Prattley; Rachel Oliver; Francesca New; Melissa Davies; James Brewin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

10.  Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm).

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Kelly A Healy; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.