Literature DB >> 9506963

Interaction between PU.1 and another Ets family transcription factor promotes macrophage-specific Basal transcription initiation.

I L Ross1, X Yue, M C Ostrowski, D A Hume.   

Abstract

Numerous macrophage-restricted promoters lack TATA boxes or other conventional initiation motifs but contain high affinity binding sites (PU boxes) for the macrophage-restricted Ets family transcription factor PU.1. In RAW264 murine macrophages, multimerized PU boxes were not active as enhancers when placed upstream of a minimal promoter. To model their role in basal promoters, we inserted PU boxes into a promoterless luciferase reporter plasmid. Two sites, regardless of orientation, were necessary and sufficient to direct reporter gene expression in transient transfections of the RAW264 macrophage-like cell line. This activity was absent in transfected 3T3 fibroblasts but could be induced by PU.1 coexpression. Both the model promoter and the macrophage-specific mouse and human c-fms promoters were activated in RAW264 cells by other Ets family transcription factors, Ets-2 and Elf-1. In fibroblasts, the effects of PU.1 and Ets-2 were multiplicative, whereas overexpression of PU.1 in RAW264 cells reduced activation of c-fms or model promoters by the other Ets factors. The PU.1 and Ets-2 binding sites of the mouse c-fms promoter have been located by DNase footprinting. A conserved Ets-like motif at the transcription site, CAGGAAC, that bound only weakly to PU.1, was identified as an additional critical basal c-fms promoter element. Comparison of studies on the model promoter, c-fms and other myeloid promoters provides evidence for a conserved mechanism that involves three separate and functionally distinct Ets-like motifs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9506963     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.12.6662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  23 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage-specific gene expression: current paradigms and future challenges.

Authors:  David R Greaves; Siamon Gordon
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  PU.1 binding to ets motifs within the equine infectious anemia virus long terminal repeat (LTR) enhancer: regulation of LTR activity and virus replication in macrophages.

Authors:  Robert Hines; Brenda R Sorensen; Madeline A Shea; Wendy Maury
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Hematopoietic cytokine-induced transcriptional regulation and Notch signaling as modulators of MDSC expansion.

Authors:  Sheinei J Saleem; Daniel H Conrad
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.932

4.  Quantitative Investigation of Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions by Biosensor Surface Plasmon Resonance.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Gregory M K Poon; W David Wilson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

5.  Protein kinase A inhibition of macrophage maturation is accompanied by an increase in DNA methylation of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor gene.

Authors:  Zbigniew Zasłona; Anne M Scruggs; Marc Peters-Golden; Steven K Huang
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Mechanistic heterogeneity in site recognition by the structurally homologous DNA-binding domains of the ETS family transcription factors Ets-1 and PU.1.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Miles H Linde; Manoj Munde; Victor D Carvalho; W David Wilson; Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Epigenetic silencing of the c-fms locus during B-lymphopoiesis occurs in discrete steps and is reversible.

Authors:  Hiromi Tagoh; Alexandra Schebesta; Pascal Lefevre; Nicola Wilson; David Hume; Meinrad Busslinger; Constanze Bonifer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Transcription factor complex formation and chromatin fine structure alterations at the murine c-fms (CSF-1 receptor) locus during maturation of myeloid precursor cells.

Authors:  Hiromi Tagoh; Roy Himes; Deborah Clarke; Pieter J M Leenen; Arthur D Riggs; David Hume; Constanze Bonifer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Cooperation between PU.1 and CAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta is necessary to induce the expression of the MD-2 gene.

Authors:  Pierre Tissières; Tanguy Araud; Agnieszka Ochoda; Geneviève Drifte; Irène Dunn-Siegrist; Jérôme Pugin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Transcription factor expression dynamics of early T-lymphocyte specification and commitment.

Authors:  Elizabeth-Sharon David-Fung; Robert Butler; Gentian Buzi; Mary A Yui; Rochelle A Diamond; Michele K Anderson; Lee Rowen; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.