BACKGROUND: The presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the prostate and its role in prostate carcinoma are in dispute. To address these issues, two laboratories with extensive HPV experience were selected to test specimens from two populations at different risk for prostate carcinoma, using three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and two serologic assays for HPV. METHODS: The cases were comprised of 51 African-American (men at high risk for prostate carcinoma) and 15 Italian (men at intermediate risk for prostate carcinoma) men with prostate carcinoma. Controls were 108 African-American men and 40 Italian men with histologically proven benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH). Prostate tissue was obtained from each patient at surgery and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The PCR primer sets included two (MY09/MY11 and GP5+/ GP6+) that amplify different regions of L1 and a third (WD66,67,154/WD72,76) targeted to E6. Sensitivity in the 2 L1 PCR assays was shown to be 1 HPV DNA genome per 100 cells. Serum antibodies to HPV-16 and HPV-11 virus-like particles (VLPs) were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: All available prostate carcinoma tissue specimens (n = 63) and BPH specimens from selected controls (n = 61) were tested by PCR. Human beta-globin DNA could be amplified from all specimens except three carcinomas, but no HPV DNA was detected in any case or control specimens by MY09/MY11 or E6 PCR. Microdissection of 27 carcinoma specimens was conducted to minimize nontumor DNA, but results remained negative by MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ PCR. In addition, serum specimens in cases (n = 63) and controls (n = 144) showed no differences in their responses against HPV-16 (P = 0.54) or HPV-11 VLPs (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that HPV is not associated with prostate carcinoma, and that HPV DNA is not at all common in the prostate glands of older men.
BACKGROUND: The presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the prostate and its role in prostate carcinoma are in dispute. To address these issues, two laboratories with extensive HPV experience were selected to test specimens from two populations at different risk for prostate carcinoma, using three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and two serologic assays for HPV. METHODS: The cases were comprised of 51 African-American (men at high risk for prostate carcinoma) and 15 Italian (men at intermediate risk for prostate carcinoma) men with prostate carcinoma. Controls were 108 African-American men and 40 Italian men with histologically proven benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH). Prostate tissue was obtained from each patient at surgery and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The PCR primer sets included two (MY09/MY11 and GP5+/ GP6+) that amplify different regions of L1 and a third (WD66,67,154/WD72,76) targeted to E6. Sensitivity in the 2 L1 PCR assays was shown to be 1 HPV DNA genome per 100 cells. Serum antibodies to HPV-16 and HPV-11 virus-like particles (VLPs) were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: All available prostate carcinoma tissue specimens (n = 63) and BPH specimens from selected controls (n = 61) were tested by PCR. Human beta-globin DNA could be amplified from all specimens except three carcinomas, but no HPV DNA was detected in any case or control specimens by MY09/MY11 or E6 PCR. Microdissection of 27 carcinoma specimens was conducted to minimize nontumor DNA, but results remained negative by MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ PCR. In addition, serum specimens in cases (n = 63) and controls (n = 144) showed no differences in their responses against HPV-16 (P = 0.54) or HPV-11 VLPs (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that HPV is not associated with prostate carcinoma, and that HPV DNA is not at all common in the prostate glands of older men.
Authors: Siobhan Sutcliffe; Raphael P Viscidi; Cathee Till; Phyllis J Goodman; Ashraful M Hoque; Ann W Hsing; Ian M Thompson; Jonathan M Zenilman; Angelo M De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Siobhan Sutcliffe; Edward Giovannucci; Charlotte A Gaydos; Raphael P Viscidi; Frank J Jenkins; Jonathan M Zenilman; Lisa P Jacobson; Angelo M De Marzo; Walter C Willett; Elizabeth A Platz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: M May; R Kalisch; B Hoschke; T Juretzek; F Wagenlehner; S Brookman-Amissah; I Spivak; K-P Braun; W Bär; C Helke Journal: Urologe A Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Jan Hrbacek; Michael Urban; Eva Hamsikova; Ruth Tachezy; Vaclav Eis; Marek Brabec; Jiri Heracek Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Oliver Hohn; Hans Krause; Pia Barbarotto; Lars Niederstadt; Nadine Beimforde; Joachim Denner; Kurt Miller; Reinhard Kurth; Norbert Bannert Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 4.602