Literature DB >> 9505915

Early and intermediate term clinical outcome after multiple coronary stenting.

A Chauhan1, E Vu, D R Ricci, C E Buller, M D Moscovich, S Monkman, I M Penn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the immediate and intermediate term clinical outcome of multiple coronary stenting.
DESIGN: Consecutive patients were prospectively entered on a dedicated database. Follow up information was obtained from outpatient and telephone interviews with patients and family physicians.
SETTING: A tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 140 consecutive patients underwent multiple coronary stenting between April 1994 and November 1996. Most patients had unstable coronary syndromes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and repeat angioplasty (PTCA).
RESULTS: The angiographic success rate was 100% and the clinical procedural success rate 93%. The mean (SD) follow up was 11.9 (7.2) months (range 2-32). The mean (SD) number of stents per patient was 2.4 (0.7). The mean (SD) number of lesions treated per patient was 1.4 (0.6). There were four in-hospital deaths (2.9%) and five patients (3.6%) had an MI before hospital discharge. All in-hospital deaths occurred in patients presenting with an acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Three patients (2.2%) had a late MI. One patient with stent thrombosis underwent emergency CABG. Three patients (2.2%) underwent late CABG. Eight patients (5.7%) had a repeat PTCA. Eighty three patients (61.5%) were asymptomatic at follow up and 121 (86.4%) were free from major clinical events.
CONCLUSION: In an era of increased operator experience, high pressure stent deployment, and reduced anticoagulation with antiplatelet treatment alone, multiple coronary stenting may be performed with a high procedural success rate and good intermediate term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9505915      PMCID: PMC1728585          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.79.1.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  18 in total

1.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Predictors of thrombotic complications after placement of the flexible coil stent.

Authors:  S K Agrawal; D S Ho; M W Liu; S Iyer; J A Hearn; A D Cannon; P J Macander; L S Dean; W A Baxley; G S Roubin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Management of restenosis within the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent (the U.S. multicenter experience. The U.S. Palmaz-Schatz Stent Investigators.

Authors:  D S Baim; M J Levine; M B Leon; S Levine; S G Ellis; R A Schatz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Subacute thrombotic complications after intracoronary implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents.

Authors:  M Haude; R Erbel; H Issa; U Straub; H J Rupprecht; N Treese; J Meyer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group.

Authors:  P W Serruys; P de Jaegere; F Kiemeneij; C Macaya; W Rutsch; G Heyndrickx; H Emanuelsson; J Marco; V Legrand; P Materne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Restenosis after placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. Initial results of a multicenter experience.

Authors:  S G Ellis; M Savage; D Fischman; D S Baim; M Leon; S Goldberg; J W Hirshfeld; M W Cleman; P S Teirstein; C Walker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Major clinical events after coronary stenting. The multicenter registry of acute and elective Gianturco-Roubin stent placement. The Gianturco-Roubin Intracoronary Stent Investigator Group.

Authors:  J M Sutton; S G Ellis; G S Roubin; C A Pinkerton; S B King; A E Raizner; D R Holmes; D J Kereiakes; E J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Thrombosis and restenosis after stenting in failed angioplasty: comparison with elective stenting.

Authors:  J B Foley; R I Brown; I M Penn
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Emergent use of balloon-expandable coronary artery stenting for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  H C Herrmann; M Buchbinder; M W Clemen; D Fischman; S Goldberg; M B Leon; R A Schatz; P Tierstein; C M Walker; J W Hirshfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Utilization of the coronary balloon-expandable coil stent without anticoagulation or intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  C M Goods; K F Al-Shaibi; S S Yadav; M W Liu; B H Negus; S S Iyer; L S Dean; S P Jain; W A Baxley; J M Parks; R J Sutor; G S Roubin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina: a common approach? Lessons learned from the EHS PCI registry.

Authors:  Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Uwe Zeymer; Matthias Hochadel; Holger Nef; Franz Weidinger; Ralf Zahn; Christian W Hamm; Jean Marco; Anselm K Gitt
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Outcomes of stenting with overlapping drug-eluting stents versus overlapping drug-eluting and bare-metal stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary lesions.

Authors:  S E Kassaian; M Salarifar; M Raissi Dehkordi; M Alidoosti; E Nematipour; H R Poorhosseini; A M Hajizeinali; D Kazemisaleh; A Sharafi; M Mahmoodian; N Paydari; A V Farahani
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.