Literature DB >> 9505777

Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness.

R J Gajraj1, M Doi, H Mantzaridis, G N Kenny.   

Abstract

We have compared the auditory evoked potential (AEP) index (a numerical index derived from the AEP), 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF), median frequency (MF) and the bispectral index (BIS) during alternating periods of consciousness and unconsciousness produced by target-controlled infusions of propofol. We studied 12 patients undergoing hip or knee replacement under spinal anaesthesia. During periods of consciousness and unconsciousness, respective mean values for the four measurements were: AEP index, 60.8 (SD 13.7) and 37.6 (6.5); BIS, 85.1 (8.2) and 66.8 (10.5); SEF, 24.2 (2.2) and 18.7 (2.1); and MF, 10.9 (3.3) and 8.8 (2.0). Threshold values with a specificity of 100% for a state of unconsciousness were: AEP index, 37 (sensitivity 52%); BIS, 55 (sensitivity 15%); and SEF, 16.0 (sensitivity 9%). There was no recorded value for MF that was 100% specific for unconsciousness. Of the four measurements, only AEP index demonstrated a significant difference (P < 0.05) between all mean values 1 min before recovery of consciousness and all mean values 1 min after recovery of consciousness. Our findings suggest that of the four electrophysiological variables, AEP index was best at distinguishing the transition from unconsciousness to consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9505777     DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.1.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  17 in total

1.  Pediatric anesthesia monitoring with the help of EEG and ECG.

Authors:  L Senhadji; G Carrault; H Gauvrit; E Wodey; P Pladys; F Carré
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.774

2.  Intraoperative auditory evoked potential recordings are more reliable at signal detection from different sensor sites on the forehead compared to bispectral index.

Authors:  Yoshiya Ishioka; Shigekazu Sugino; Tomo Hayase; Piotr K Janicki
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Cerebral state index versus bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama; Kyoko Komatsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery.

Authors:  Leslie C Jameson; Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Canonical bicoherence analysis of dynamic EEG data.

Authors:  Huixia He; David J Thomson
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Investigation of optical neuro-monitoring technique for detection of maintenance and emergence states during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Gabriela Hernandez-Meza; Meltem Izzetoglu; Mary Osbakken; Michael Green; Hawa Abubakar; Kurtulus Izzetoglu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Investigation of data-driven optical neuromonitoring approach during general anesthesia with sevoflurane.

Authors:  Gabriela Hernandez-Meza; Meltem Izzetoglu; Ahmet Sacan; Michael Green; Kurtulus Izzetoglu
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.593

8.  Auditory evoked potentials index versus bispectral index during propofol sedation in spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Correlation beween AAI-index and the BIS-index during propofol hypnosis: a clinical study.

Authors:  Russell E Anderson; Gunilla Barr; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 10.  A Narrative Review on Clinical Applications of fNIRS.

Authors:  Md Asadur Rahman; Abu Bakar Siddik; Tarun Kanti Ghosh; Farzana Khanam; Mohiuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.