PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements of brain lesion load in multiple sclerosis (MS) by using two proposed acquisition schemes. METHODS: Three-millimeter-thick conventional spin-echo (CSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequences were obtained and the lesions segmented using a semiautomated technique based on local thresholding to calculate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. These were compared with images obtained from two separate MR units in which 5-mm CSE sequences were obtained and segmented by using the local thresholding technique and also by manual outlining. RESULTS: The intraobserver coefficient of variation was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0% to 4.5%) for the 5-mm CSE sequence measured with manual outlining, 3.1% (95% CI, 2.5% to 3.2%) and 5.1% (95% CI, 4.1% to 5.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences measured using the local thresholding technique, 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9% to 6.6%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.1% to 2.7%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The interobserver coefficient of variation was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 8.7%) and 8.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 9.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences, 7.3% (95% CI, 4.7% to 9.1%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.3% to 3.3%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements obtained with the fast FLAIR technique was significantly better than those obtained with the other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the intraobserver and interobserver variability in quantifying MS lesions can be reduced significantly with the use of fast FLAIR sequences, while no significant improvement is gained by reducing the section thickness from 5 mm to 3 mm.
PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements of brain lesion load in multiple sclerosis (MS) by using two proposed acquisition schemes. METHODS: Three-millimeter-thick conventional spin-echo (CSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequences were obtained and the lesions segmented using a semiautomated technique based on local thresholding to calculate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. These were compared with images obtained from two separate MR units in which 5-mm CSE sequences were obtained and segmented by using the local thresholding technique and also by manual outlining. RESULTS: The intraobserver coefficient of variation was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0% to 4.5%) for the 5-mm CSE sequence measured with manual outlining, 3.1% (95% CI, 2.5% to 3.2%) and 5.1% (95% CI, 4.1% to 5.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences measured using the local thresholding technique, 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9% to 6.6%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.1% to 2.7%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The interobserver coefficient of variation was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 8.7%) and 8.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 9.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences, 7.3% (95% CI, 4.7% to 9.1%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.3% to 3.3%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements obtained with the fast FLAIR technique was significantly better than those obtained with the other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the intraobserver and interobserver variability in quantifying MS lesions can be reduced significantly with the use of fast FLAIR sequences, while no significant improvement is gained by reducing the section thickness from 5 mm to 3 mm.
Authors: Daniel E Maidana; Pavlina Tsoka; Bo Tian; Bernard Dib; Hidetaka Matsumoto; Keiko Kataoka; Haijiang Lin; Joan W Miller; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Qian Jun Yap; Irvin Teh; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Min Yi Sum; Carissa Kuswanto; Kang Sim Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: D M Moriarty; A J Blackshaw; P R Talbot; H L Griffiths; J S Snowden; V F Hillier; S Capener; R D Laitt; A Jackson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Edru Erbayat Altay; Elizabeth Fisher; Stephen E Jones; Claire Hara-Cleaver; Jar-Chi Lee; Richard A Rudick Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Faisal Khosa; Atif N Khan; Khurram Nasir; Arash Bedayat; Zehra Malik; Ali F Jon; Ahmad R Cheema; Melvin E Clouse; Francine K Welty Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Kevin C Ma; James R Fernandez; Lilyana Amezcua; Alex Lerner; Mark S Shiroishi; Brent J Liu Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.790