Literature DB >> 9503909

Withdrawing attention at little or no cost: detection and discrimination tasks.

J Braun1, B Julesz.   

Abstract

We used a concurrent-task paradigm to investigate the attentional cost of simple visual tasks. As in earlier studies, we found that detecting a unique orientation in an array of oriented elements ("pop-out") carries little or no attentional cost. Surprisingly, this is true at all levels of performance and holds even when pop-out is barely discriminable. We discuss this finding in the context of our previous report that the attentional cost of stimulus detection is strongly influenced by the presence and nature of other stimuli in the display (Braun, 1994b). For discrimination tasks, we obtained a similarly mixed outcome: Discrimination of letter shape carried a high attentional cost whereas discrimination of color and orientation did not. Taken together, these findings lead us to modify our earlier position on the attentional costs of detection and discrimination tasks (Sagi & Julesz, 1985). We now believe that observers enjoy a significant degree of "ambient" visual awareness outside the focus of attention, permitting them to both detect and discriminate certain visual information. We hypothesize that the information in question is selected by a competition for saliency at the level of early vision.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9503909     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

1.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.

Authors:  Fei Fei Li; Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Subjective inflation: phenomenology's get-rich-quick scheme.

Authors:  J D Knotts; Brian Odegaard; Hakwan Lau; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-14

3.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Kristin O Michod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Why don't we see changes?: The role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Andrea Reinecke; Peter Brawn
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006

6.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Conscious access in the near absence of attention: critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Julian Matthews; Pia Schröder; Lisandro Kaunitz; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Influence and limitations of popout in the selection of salient visual stimuli by area V4 neurons.

Authors:  Brittany E Burrows; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The power of the feed-forward sweep.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.