Literature DB >> 9502724

Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is differentially required to potentiate DPP responses.

R G Wisotzkey1, A Mehra, D J Sutherland, L L Dobens, X Liu, C Dohrmann, L Attisano, L A Raftery.   

Abstract

Mothers against dpp (Mad) mediates Decapentaplegic (DPP) signaling throughout Drosophila development. Here we demonstrate that Medea encodes a MAD-related protein that functions in DPP signaling. MEDEA is most similar to mammalian Smad4 and forms heteromeric complexes with MAD. Like dpp, Medea is essential for embryonic dorsal/ventral patterning. However, Mad is essential in the germline for oogenesis whereas Medea is dispensable. In the wing primordium, loss of Medea most severely affects regions receiving low DPP signal. MEDEA is localized in the cytoplasm, is not regulated by phosphorylation, and requires physical association with MAD for nuclear translocation. Furthermore, inactivating MEDEA mutations prevent nuclear translocation either by preventing interaction with MAD or by trapping MAD/MEDEA complexes in the cytosol. Thus MAD-mediated nuclear translocation is essential for MEDEA function. Together these data show that, while MAD is essential for mediating all DPP signals, heteromeric MAD/MEDEA complexes function to modify or enhance DPP responses. We propose that this provides a general model for Smad4/MEDEA function in signaling by the TGF-beta family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9502724     DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  41 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers.

Authors:  S J Newfeld; R G Wisotzkey; S Kumar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An allelic series of mutations in Smad2 and Smad4 identified in a genotype-based screen of N-ethyl-N- nitrosourea-mutagenized mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jay L Vivian; Yijing Chen; Della Yee; Elizabeth Schneider; Terry Magnuson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An analysis using the hobo genetic system reveals that combinatorial signaling by the Dpp and Wg pathways regulates dpp expression in leading edge cells of the dorsal ectoderm in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S J Newfeld; N T Takaesu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A novel function of Drosophila eIF4A as a negative regulator of Dpp/BMP signalling that mediates SMAD degradation.

Authors:  Jinghong Li; Willis X Li
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  A screen for modifiers of decapentaplegic mutant phenotypes identifies lilliputian, the only member of the Fragile-X/Burkitt's Lymphoma family of transcription factors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M A Su; R G Wisotzkey; S J Newfeld
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Cross-talk between nitric oxide and transforming growth factor-beta1 in malaria.

Authors:  Yoram Vodovotz; Ruben Zamora; Matthew J Lieber; Shirley Luckhart
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Common partner Smad-independent canonical bone morphogenetic protein signaling in the specification process of the anterior rhombic lip during cerebellum development.

Authors:  Ka Kui Tong; Kin Ming Kwan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Antagonistic Smad transcription factors control the dauer/non-dauer switch in C. elegans.

Authors:  Donha Park; Annette Estevez; Donald L Riddle
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Drosophila Smad2 opposes Mad signaling during wing vein development.

Authors:  Veronika Sander; Edward Eivers; Renee H Choi; Edward M De Robertis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions.

Authors:  Stewart MacArthur; Xiao-Yong Li; Jingyi Li; James B Brown; Hou Cheng Chu; Lucy Zeng; Brandi P Grondona; Aaron Hechmer; Lisa Simirenko; Soile V E Keränen; David W Knowles; Mark Stapleton; Peter Bickel; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.