T Suppes1, A J Rush, H C Kraemer, A Webb. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While monotherapy has significant limitations in bipolar disorder, few published data addressing alternatives exist. Treatment algorithms have been proposed, but none have undergone empirical evaluation. This study provides a systematic prospective, open evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of a treatment algorithm for patients with histories of mania. METHOD: Twenty-eight symptomatic outpatients from a public mental health facility who were diagnosed as having either bipolar I or schizoaffective illness, bipolar type, entered the study. Minimum blood levels of lithium and divalproex sodium were defined. Medications were pushed to predetermined levels (as tolerated) before proceeding to the next algorithm step. Clinical symptoms were assessed monthly using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS, 27 item) and Clinical Global Impressions scale. RESULTS: Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical symptoms were compared. Over 50% of patients attained 30% improvement from baseline BPRS after 4 months. Thirty-six percent of patients (N = 10) became mood stable, 46% (N = 13) remained mood unstable, and 18% (N = 5) dropped out before completing the algorithm. Although patients who finished the algorithm were taking more medication, either dosage and/or drugs, somatic complaints did not increase. CONCLUSION: The potential benefit of a defined treatment algorithm was demonstrated for these complex and persistently ill patients. Despite long treatment histories, patients improved with more frequent visits and addition of medication(s). A randomized controlled trial comparing a similar treatment algorithm with treatment-as-usual is warranted.
BACKGROUND: While monotherapy has significant limitations in bipolar disorder, few published data addressing alternatives exist. Treatment algorithms have been proposed, but none have undergone empirical evaluation. This study provides a systematic prospective, open evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of a treatment algorithm for patients with histories of mania. METHOD: Twenty-eight symptomatic outpatients from a public mental health facility who were diagnosed as having either bipolar I or schizoaffective illness, bipolar type, entered the study. Minimum blood levels of lithium and divalproex sodium were defined. Medications were pushed to predetermined levels (as tolerated) before proceeding to the next algorithm step. Clinical symptoms were assessed monthly using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS, 27 item) and Clinical Global Impressions scale. RESULTS: Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical symptoms were compared. Over 50% of patients attained 30% improvement from baseline BPRS after 4 months. Thirty-six percent of patients (N = 10) became mood stable, 46% (N = 13) remained mood unstable, and 18% (N = 5) dropped out before completing the algorithm. Although patients who finished the algorithm were taking more medication, either dosage and/or drugs, somatic complaints did not increase. CONCLUSION: The potential benefit of a defined treatment algorithm was demonstrated for these complex and persistently ill patients. Despite long treatment histories, patients improved with more frequent visits and addition of medication(s). A randomized controlled trial comparing a similar treatment algorithm with treatment-as-usual is warranted.
Authors: Louisa G Sylvia; Aleena Hay; Michael J Ostacher; David J Miklowitz; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Gary S Sachs; Thilo Deckersbach; Roy H Perlis Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Andrew A Nierenberg; Louisa G Sylvia; Andrew C Leon; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Leah W Shesler; Susan L McElroy; Edward S Friedman; Michael E Thase; Richard C Shelton; Charles L Bowden; Mauricio Tohen; Vivek Singh; Thilo Deckersbach; Terence A Ketter; James H Kocsis; Melvin G McInnis; David Schoenfeld; William V Bobo; Joseph R Calabrese Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.486