BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic creation of an intestinal stoma may be preferable to open operation when intervention is required solely for faecal diversion. METHODS: Experience with laparoscopic intestinal stoma formation for faecal diversion from a single institution is presented. RESULTS: A total of 55 stomas were studied, 40 laparoscopic and 15 open. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open operation was 5 per cent. Mean(s.e.m.) operating time was significantly reduced for laparoscopic stomas (54(4.7) versus 72(8.7) min). Time to return of bowel function was significantly reduced (1.6(0.3) versus 2.2(0.2) days). Mean(s.e.m.) hospital stay was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (7.4(0.5) versus 12.6(2.5) days). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality appeared to be reduced in patients undergoing laparoscopic stoma formation. The technique was found to be safe, suitable for the majority of patients and to give results superior to those of open surgery.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic creation of an intestinal stoma may be preferable to open operation when intervention is required solely for faecal diversion. METHODS: Experience with laparoscopic intestinal stoma formation for faecal diversion from a single institution is presented. RESULTS: A total of 55 stomas were studied, 40 laparoscopic and 15 open. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open operation was 5 per cent. Mean(s.e.m.) operating time was significantly reduced for laparoscopic stomas (54(4.7) versus 72(8.7) min). Time to return of bowel function was significantly reduced (1.6(0.3) versus 2.2(0.2) days). Mean(s.e.m.) hospital stay was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (7.4(0.5) versus 12.6(2.5) days). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality appeared to be reduced in patients undergoing laparoscopic stoma formation. The technique was found to be safe, suitable for the majority of patients and to give results superior to those of open surgery.
Authors: H Scheidbach; H Ptok; D Schubert; D Kose; O Hügel; I Gastinger; F Köckerling; H Lippert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2007-08-10 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Lisa A Dos Santos; Brian M Slomovitz; Marilyn Huang; Kevin Holcomb; Pedro T Ramirez; Thomas A Caputo Journal: JSLS Date: 2008 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Seung-Seop Yeom; Chan Wook Kim; Sung Woo Jung; Se Heon Oh; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: Ann Coloproctol Date: 2018-04-30