Literature DB >> 9499419

Non-disjunction of chromosome 18.

M Bugge1, A Collins, M B Petersen, J Fisher, C Brandt, J M Hertz, L Tranebjaerg, C de Lozier-Blanchet, P Nicolaides, K Brøndum-Nielsen, N Morton, M Mikkelsen.   

Abstract

A sample of 100 trisomy 18 conceptuses analysed separately and together with a published sample of 61 conceptuses confirms that an error in maternal meiosis II (MII) is the most frequent cause of non-disjunction for chromosome 18. This is unlike all other human trisomies that have been studied, which show a higher frequency in maternal meiosis I (MI). Maternal MI trisomy 18 shows a low frequency of recombination in proximal p and medial q, but not the reduction in proximal q observed in chromosome 21 MI non-disjunction. Maternal MII non-disjunction does not fit the entanglement model that predicts increased recombination, especially near the centromere. Whereas recent data on MII trisomy 21 show the predicted increase in recombination proximally, maternal MII trisomy 18 has non-significantly reduced recombination. Therefore, chromosome-specific factors must complicate the simple model of susceptible chiasma distributions interacting with age-dependent deterioration of the meiotic mechanism. For chromosome 18, 30% of tetrads are nullichiasmate in maternal MI non-disjunction, but nullichiasmates are not observed in maternal MII non-disjunction. Chiasma distributions from normal chromosome 18 meioses provide no evidence for normal disjunction from nullichiasmate tetrads. We extend this study to examine the remaining autosomes and find no evidence for normal disjunction from nullichiasmate tetrads generally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9499419     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/7.4.661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  25 in total

1.  Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the centre d'Etude du polymorphisme humain.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Characterization of human crossover interference.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Evaluation of PRDM9 variation as a risk factor for recurrent genomic disorders and chromosomal non-disjunction.

Authors:  Christelle Borel; Fanny Cheung; Helen Stewart; David A Koolen; Christopher Phillips; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; Stephan Eliez; Andrew J Sharp
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Meiotic origins of maternal age-related aneuploidy.

Authors:  Teresa Chiang; Richard M Schultz; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Germline mosaicism does not explain the maternal age effect on trisomy.

Authors:  Ross Rowsey; Anna Kashevarova; Brenda Murdoch; Carrie Dickenson; Tracey Woodruff; Edith Cheng; Patricia Hunt; Terry Hassold
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  DNA damage in aging, the stem cell perspective.

Authors:  Taylor McNeely; Michael Leone; Hagai Yanai; Isabel Beerman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem.

Authors:  So I Nagaoka; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Classic Weinstein: tetrad analysis, genetic variation and achiasmate segregation in Drosophila and humans.

Authors:  M E Zwick; D J Cutler; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic variation in rates of nondisjunction: association of two naturally occurring polymorphisms in the chromokinesin nod with increased rates of nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E Zwick; J L Salstrom; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Meiotic recombination in human oocytes.

Authors:  Edith Y Cheng; Patricia A Hunt; Theresa A Naluai-Cecchini; Corrine L Fligner; Victor Y Fujimoto; Tanya L Pasternack; Jackie M Schwartz; Jody E Steinauer; Tracey J Woodruff; Sheila M Cherry; Terah A Hansen; Rhea U Vallente; Karl W Broman; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.