Literature DB >> 9499330

Building measurement and data collection into medical practice.

E C Nelson1, M E Splaine, P B Batalden, S K Plume.   

Abstract

Clinicians can use data to improve daily clinical practice. This paper offers eight principles for using data to support improvement in busy clinical settings: 1) seek usefulness, not perfection, in the measurement; 2) use a balanced set of process, outcome, and cost measures; 3) keep measurement simple (think big, but start small); 4) use qualitative and quantitative data; 5) write down the operational definitions of measures; 6) measure small, representative samples; 7) build measurement into daily work; and 8) develop a measurement team. The following approaches to using data for improvement are recommended. First, begin with curiosity about outcomes or a need to improve results. Second, try to avoid knee-jerk, obstructive criticism of proposed measurements. Instead, propose solutions that are practical, goal-oriented, and good enough to start with. Third, gather baseline data on a small sample and check the findings. Fourth, try to change and improve the delivery process while gathering data. Fifth, plot results over time and analyze them by using a control chart or other graphical method. Sixth, refine your understanding of variation in processes and outcomes by dividing patients into clinically homogeneous subgroups (stratification) and analyzing the results separately for each subgroup. Finally, make further changes while measuring key outcomes over time. Measurement and improvement are intertwined; it is impossible to make improvements without measurement. Measuring and learning from each patient and using the information gleaned to test improvements can become part of daily medical practice in local settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9499330     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-6-199803150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  22 in total

1.  Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach.

Authors:  M A van Bokhoven; G Kok; T van der Weijden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

2.  Decision support and safety of clinical environments.

Authors:  A H Morris
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems.

Authors:  Jatin Shah; Dimple Rajgor; Shreyasee Pradhan; Mariana McCready; Amrapali Zaveri; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Information technology as a tool to improve the quality of American Indian health care.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Theresa Cullen; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Using real time process measurements to reduce catheter related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  R J Wall; E W Ely; T A Elasy; R S Dittus; J Foss; K S Wilkerson; T Speroff
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

Review 6.  Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review.

Authors:  Johan Thor; Jonas Lundberg; Jakob Ask; Jesper Olsson; Cheryl Carli; Karin Pukk Härenstam; Mats Brommels
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-10

7.  Assessing the sensibility of two clinical decision support systems.

Authors:  Timothy A D Graham; Michael J Bullard; Andre W Kushniruk; Brian R Holroyd; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  The NHS's 50 anniversary. Looking forward. The NHS: feeling well and thriving at 75.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

9.  Quality endoscopists and quality endoscopy units.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04

10.  Beyond the EPR: complementary roles of the hospital-wide electronic health record and clinical departmental systems.

Authors:  Eivind Vedvik; Aksel H Tjora; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.