Literature DB >> 9498351

Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.

M S Culbertson1, J W Mabry, I Misztal, N Gengler, J K Bertrand, L Varona.   

Abstract

We used 179,485 Yorkshire reproductive and 239,354 Yorkshire growth records to estimate additive and dominance variances by Method Fraktur R. Estimates were obtained for number born alive (NBA), 21-d litter weight (LWT), days to 104.5 kg (DAYS), and backfat at 104.5 kg (BF). The single-trait models for NBA and LWT included the fixed effects of contemporary group and regression on inbreeding percentage and the random effects mate within contemporary group, animal permanent environment, animal additive, and parental dominance. The single-trait models for DAYS and BF included the fixed effects of contemporary group, sex, and regression on inbreeding percentage and the random effects litter of birth, dam permanent environment, animal additive, and parental dominance. Final estimates were obtained from six samples for each trait. Regression coefficients for 10% inbreeding were found to be -.23 for NBA, -.52 kg for LWT, 2.1 d for DAYS, and 0 mm for BF. Estimates of additive and dominance variances expressed as a percentage of phenotypic variances were, respectively, 8.8 +/- .5 and 2.2 +/- .7 for NBA, 8.1 +/- 1.1 and 6.3 +/- .9 for LWT, 33.2 +/- .4 and 10.3 +/- 1.5 for DAYS, and 43.6 +/- .9 and 4.8 +/- .7 for BF. The ratio of dominance to additive variances ranged from .78 to .11.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9498351     DOI: 10.2527/1998.762448x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Guosheng Su; Ole F Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Mark Henryon; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.

Authors:  Hadi Esfandyari; Piter Bijma; Mark Henryon; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Anders Christian Sørensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Jean-Michel Elsen; Ignacy Misztal; William Herring; Andrès Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.

Authors:  Xiangyu Guo; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Yachun Wang; Mogens Sandø Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Andrés Legarra; William Herring; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.

Authors:  Houssemeddine Srihi; José Luis Noguera; Victoria Topayan; Melani Martín de Hijas; Noelia Ibañez-Escriche; Joaquim Casellas; Marta Vázquez-Gómez; María Martínez-Castillero; Juan Pablo Rosas; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.