Literature DB >> 9496984

Intensity and amount of physical activity in relation to insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

E J Mayer-Davis1, R D'Agostino, A J Karter, S M Haffner, M J Rewers, M Saad, R N Bergman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Exercise training is associated with improved insulin sensitivity (SI), but the potential impact of habitual, nonvigorous activity is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether habitual, nonvigorous physical activity, as well as vigorous and overall activity, is associated with better SI.
DESIGN: A multicultural epidemiologic study.
SETTING: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, conducted in Oakland, Calif; Los Angeles, Calif; the San Luis Valley, Colo; and San Antonio, Tex. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1467 men and women of African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white ethnicity, aged 40 to 69 years, with glucose tolerance ranging from normal to mild non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Insulin sensitivity as measured by an intravenous glucose tolerance test.
RESULTS: The mean SI for individuals who participated in vigorous activity 5 or more times per week was 1.59 min(-1) x microU(-1) x mL(-1) x 10(-4) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.79) compared with 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) for those who rarely or never participated in vigorous activity, after adjusting for potential confounders (P<.001). When habitual physical activity (estimated energy expenditure [EEE]) was assessed by 1-year recall of activities, the correlation coefficient between SI and total EEE was 0.14 (P<.001). After adjustment for confounders, vigorous and nonvigorous levels of EEE (metabolic equivalent levels > or = 6.0 and <6.0, respectively) were each positively and independently associated with SI (P< or =.01 for each). The association was attenuated after adjustment for the potential mediators, body mass index (a measure of weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters), and waist-to-hip ratio. Results were similar for subgroups of sex, ethnicity, and diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased participation in nonvigorous as well as overall and vigorous physical activity was associated with significantly higher SI. These findings lend further support to current public health recommendations for increased moderate-intensity physical activity on most days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9496984     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.9.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  120 in total

1.  Cardiovascular disease in African-American women: a dilemma of culture.

Authors:  G C Dennis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Exercising for health: the merits of lifestyle physical activity.

Authors:  L S Pescatello
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-02

3.  Walking or vigorous exercise? Which best helps prevent coronary heart disease in women?

Authors:  B V Taylor; G Y Oudit; M F Evans
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Accumulation of physical activity for health gains: what is the evidence?

Authors:  A E Hardman
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Physical activity to prevent cardiovascular disease. How much is enough?

Authors:  Robert G Haennel; Francine Lemire
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  [Aerobic and strength training in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure].

Authors:  D Niederseer; J Niebauer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  The role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: implications for treatment.

Authors:  G Stennis Watson; Suzanne Craft
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  The epidemiology of lifestyle and risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rob M van Dam
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Obesity and sedentary lifestyle: modifiable risk factors for prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E J Mayer-Davis; T Costacou
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Protein and diabetes: much advice, little research.

Authors:  Marion J Franz
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.