Literature DB >> 9496918

Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations.

P J Plasmans1, N H Creugers, J Mulder.   

Abstract

In cost-effectiveness analysis and contemporary treatment planning strategies, the postponement of placement of cast crowns plays an important role. Extensive amalgam restorations that involve the rebuilding of cusps and the provision of auxiliary retention are thought to make this postponement possible. This study reports the long-term survival (100 months) of extensive amalgam restorations in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. The operational hypothesis was that the type of retention and the operator have a long-term influence on the survival and clinical functioning of extensive amalgam restorations. Three hundred extensive amalgam restorations were placed by three operators in molar teeth in which one or more cusps were reconstructed. Five different auxiliary retention methods were used for retention of these restorations. Since the purpose of extensive amalgam restorations is considered to be two-fold (to restore a broken-down molar to function acceptably as an independent restoration and to create a substructure for subsequent crown construction), survival was assessed at different levels. The survival rate of extensive amalgam restorations as an independent restoration was 88+/-2%. The functional survival rate (as an independent restoration or as a substructure) was 92+/-2%. The influence of experimental variables ('retention method' and 'operator') and background variables ('tooth type', 'extension of extensive amalgam restorations', and 'age of patient') on the survival was analyzed by Log Rank and Breslow tests. The analyses revealed that there were no statistically significant influences on the survival rates except for the variable 'age of patient' (p < or = 0.05). Extensive amalgam restorations were more prone to failure in the group of older patients than in the group of younger ones. It is concluded that the clinical survival of extensive amalgam restorations is independent from several clinical variables in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9496918     DOI: 10.1177/00220345980770030401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  12 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Restoration of the root canal treated tooth.

Authors:  S Eliyas; J Jalili; N Martin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  F Mannocci; J Cowie
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Low Prevalence of Amalgam-Associated Lichenoid Lesions in the Oral Cavity: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Shivani Mallishery; Nikita Bajaj; K Banga; Ashna Mehra; Rajiv Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Restoration outcomes after restoring vital teeth with advanced caries lesions: a practice-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Hannes Krüger; Peter Schlattmann; Sebastian Paris
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review.

Authors:  Arvind Shenoy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

7.  Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam restorations in patients referring to a dental school in iran.

Authors:  Firoz Pouralibaba; Mohammad Joulaei; Atabak Kashefimehr; Farzaneh Pakdel; Zahra Jamali; Ali Esmaeili
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2010-06-24

8.  Dental amalgam: An update.

Authors:  Ramesh Bharti; Kulvinder Kaur Wadhwani; Aseem Prakash Tikku; Anil Chandra
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-10

9.  Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation programs in Colorado.

Authors:  Joan M O'Connell; Diane Brunson; Theresa Anselmo; Patrick W Sullivan
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function.

Authors:  Brenda S Bohaty; Qiang Ye; Anil Misra; Fabio Sene; Paulette Spencer
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.