P Skok1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Maribor Teaching Hospital, Slovenia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopy is the method of choice for localizing the sites of hemorrhage and transendoscopic hemostatic procedures in patients with hemorrhage from the digestive tract. The aim of the study was to establish the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis and to analyze the mortality of patients with upper digestive tract hemorrhage. METHODOLOGY: The retrospective analysis included those patients who had undergone urgent endoscopic examination of the upper digestive tract and hemostatic interventions with injection sclerotherapy, laser photocoagulation or electrocoagulation of the hemorrhaging spot in the period between January 1994 and May 1995. RESULTS: 1000 patients were examined, 638 men and 362 women. In only 312 patients (31.2%) the examination revealed signs of acute or recent hemorrhage. Hemostatic interventions were performed in 275 (27.5%) cases. During hospitalization at the medical wards, 14 (9/275, 5.1%) patients died. In 9 patients (9/275, 3%) with acute hemorrhage, endoscopic hemostasis did not prove successful, therefore after several unsuccessfully repeated endoscopic interventions (21 in all), the patients were treated operatively. During the postoperative period, 4 patients died due to complications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of endoscopic instruments and improved methods of hemostasis, mortality due to hemorrhage from the digestive tract has not dramatically decreased. Numerous demanding endoscopic procedures are usually carried out in older patients which also suffer from other diseases. These diseases represent the risk factors for eventual surgical treatment and the ensuing complications.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopy is the method of choice for localizing the sites of hemorrhage and transendoscopic hemostatic procedures in patients with hemorrhage from the digestive tract. The aim of the study was to establish the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis and to analyze the mortality of patients with upper digestive tract hemorrhage. METHODOLOGY: The retrospective analysis included those patients who had undergone urgent endoscopic examination of the upper digestive tract and hemostatic interventions with injection sclerotherapy, laser photocoagulation or electrocoagulation of the hemorrhaging spot in the period between January 1994 and May 1995. RESULTS: 1000 patients were examined, 638 men and 362 women. In only 312 patients (31.2%) the examination revealed signs of acute or recent hemorrhage. Hemostatic interventions were performed in 275 (27.5%) cases. During hospitalization at the medical wards, 14 (9/275, 5.1%) patients died. In 9 patients (9/275, 3%) with acute hemorrhage, endoscopic hemostasis did not prove successful, therefore after several unsuccessfully repeated endoscopic interventions (21 in all), the patients were treated operatively. During the postoperative period, 4 patients died due to complications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of endoscopic instruments and improved methods of hemostasis, mortality due to hemorrhage from the digestive tract has not dramatically decreased. Numerous demanding endoscopic procedures are usually carried out in older patients which also suffer from other diseases. These diseases represent the risk factors for eventual surgical treatment and the ensuing complications.