Literature DB >> 9496350

Improved clinical outcomes for in vitro fertilization with delay of embryo transfer from 48 to 72 hours after oocyte retrieval: use of glucose- and phosphate-free media.

A J Carrillo1, B Lane, D D Pridman, P P Risch, T B Pool, I H Silverman, C L Cook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of day 2 versus day 3 ET using a culture media with no glucose or phosphate.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study.
SETTING: Hospital-based fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): One hundred seventy-six IVF-ET patients undergoing controlled ovarian supraovulation. INTERVENTION(S): IVF and delaying the ET by 1 day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of blastomeres per embryo, implantation and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Delaying the ET from day 2 to day 3 after oocyte retrieval significantly increased implantation rates (13% versus 24%) and ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates per retrieval (26% versus 44%). Day 3 embryos with > or = 8 blastomeres resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (53%) than day 3 embryos with < 8 cells (23%) and day 2 embryos with > or = 4 cells (31%) or < 4 cells (11%). CONCLUSION(S): Day 3 ET was associated with a significant increase in implantation and pregnancy rates. Delaying the ET until day 3 may permit the selection of more viable embryos than on day 2. The absence of glucose and phosphate from the culture media is compatible with good IVF outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9496350     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00499-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of day 2 versus day 3 embryo transfer using serum-free culture media: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Ertzeid; P O Dale; T Tanbo; R Storeng; E Kjekshus; T Abyholm
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A prospective randomized multicenter study to evaluate the best day for embryo transfer: does the outcome justify prolonged embryo culture?

Authors:  Markus Margreiter; Andrea Weghofer; Avi Kogosowski; Kamal Zak Mahmoud; Wilfried Feichtinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is the presence of a non-cleaved embryo on day 3 associated with poorer quality of the remaining embryos in the cohort?

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Charles L Bormann; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Salim Daya; Phill Matson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-14

5.  A study failing to determine significant benefits from assisted hatching: patients selected for advanced age, zonal thickness of embryos, and previous failed attempts.

Authors:  W R Edirisinghe; V Ahnonkitpanit; S Promviengchai; S Suwajanakorn; K Pruksananonda; V Chinpilas; P Virutamasen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The effect of day 2 versus day 3 embryo transfer on early pregnancy outcomes in women with a low yield of fertilized oocytes.

Authors:  C R Sacha; I Dimitriadis; G Christou; I Souter; C L Bormann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Randomized study comparing day 2 versus day 3 elective transfer of two good-quality embryos.

Authors:  Tatsuya Suzuki; Hiroaki Shibahara; Yuki Hirano; Akiko Ohno; Satoru Takamizawa; Mitsuaki Suzuki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2004-05-20

8.  Embryo transfer in days 2 to 4 following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Atossa Mahdavi; Ali Qashqaei; Ashraf Aleyasin; Marzieh Aghahosseini; Leili Safdarian; Zahra Rezaeean; Parvin Fallahi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-09-12

9.  Efficacy of embryo transfer on day 2 versus day 3 according to maternal age in patients with normal ovarian response.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Lee; Jeong-Ho Cha; Sun-Hee Shin; Yun-Jeong Kim; Seul-Ki Lee; Choon-Keun Park; Kyung-Ah Pak; Ji-Sung Yoon; Seo-Young Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-09-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.