Literature DB >> 9495686

Misclassification of smoking in a follow-up population study in southern Germany.

W D Heller1, G Scherer, E Sennewald, F Adlkofer.   

Abstract

Smoking prevalence in southern Germany was studied in 1984-1985 using a representative cohort of 4022 subjects aged 25 to 64 years, with 3753 reinterviewed in 1987-1988. Data were available for analysis from interviews on self-reported smoking behavior and from serum cotinine measurements in both investigations. More men than women reported current smoking, and particularly heavy smoking. Serum cotinine levels increased steadily with the daily number and nicotine yield of cigarettes smoked. Mean cotinine levels in ex-smokers were higher than those in never smokers, suggesting that a higher percentage of current smokers are misclassified as ex-smokers than never smokers. Using cotinine rather than self-reported smoking data increased the proportion of true smokers in the subgroup of self-reported smokers by about 3% in males and by about 1% in females. Data from the reinterviews revealed that reported smoking status confirmed by cotinine measurement in 1987-1988 conflicted in a number of cases with the data obtained in 1984-1985 using the same procedure. For example, 0.1% of those who stated they were current regular smokers, 4.3% of those who stated they were current occasional smokers, and 17.6% of those who stated they were ex-smokers in 1984-1985 claimed in 1987-1988 to have never smoked. This misclassification of ex-smokers was higher in women. Altogether the true proportion of ex-smokers among self-reported never smokers was about 9.7% (17.8% in men and 6.7% in women). The widely variable uptake of tobacco smoke by smokers, as well as the misclassification of true smokers and ex-smokers as never smokers, needs to be considered in epidemiological studies evaluating the health risks from both active and passive smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9495686     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00279-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

1.  Is the hair nicotine level a more accurate biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure than urine cotinine?

Authors:  W K Al-Delaimy; J Crane; A Woodward
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Self-reported and serum cotinine-validated smoking in pregnant women in Estonia.

Authors:  Kersti Pärna; Mati Rahu; Linda D Youngman; Kaja Rahu; Mari Nygård-Kibur; Ilona Koupil
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification.

Authors:  Sungroul Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Parental smoking and childhood cancer: results from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study.

Authors:  D Pang; R McNally; J M Birch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Lifestyle factors and experience of respiratory alarm symptoms in the general population.

Authors:  Lisa Maria Falk Sele; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam; Sandra Elnegaard; Jens Søndergaard; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  An integrated inspection of the somatic mutations in a lung squamous cell carcinoma using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Lucy F Stead; Philip Egan; Aoife Devery; Caroline Conway; Catherine Daly; Stefano Berri; Henry Wood; Ornella Belvedere; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Anderson Ryan; Pamela Rabbitts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lifestyle factors and contact to general practice with respiratory alarm symptoms-a population-based study.

Authors:  Lisa Maria Falk Sele; Sandra Elnegaard; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam; Jens Søndergaard; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.