Literature DB >> 9495224

Survival in 2367 zidovudine-treated patients according to use of other nucleoside analogue drugs. The EuroSIDA Study Group.

A N Phillips1, C Katlama, S Barton, S Vella, A Blaxhult, B Clotet, F D Goebel, B Hirschel, C Pedersen, J D Lundgren.   

Abstract

To evaluate survival according to use of different nucleoside drugs in a routine clinical setting, we studied a large group of zidovudine-treated patients seen in clinics across Europe. A total of 3128 subjects was recruited to the observational, prospective EuroSIDA study in May 1994. These were consecutive patients (up to a predefined limit) seen at outpatient clinics in 37 centers from 16 European countries and followed at 6-month intervals by use of standardized forms completed by clinicians at the respective centers. This report concerns 2367 subjects who began antiretroviral therapy with a regime that included zidovudine either before study entry or during the course of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted, with use of other antiretroviral drugs, CD4 count, and date of development of AIDS fitted as time-dependent covariates. Survival times from start of therapy were left truncated at study entry to avoid survival bias. In addition to zidovudine, antiretroviral drugs used included didanosine (ddI) (n = 1119; median 1.6 years after starting zidovudine), dideoxycytidine (ddC) (n = 592; median 1.9 years after starting zidovudine), stavudine (d4T) (n = 241; median 2.9 years after starting zidovudine) and lamivudine (3TC) (n = 33 ; median 2.7 years after starting zidovudine). Of the 2367 patients, 613 died during follow-up. Overall, risk of death was reduced in those zidovudine-treated patients who began at least one other nucleoside analogue drug with or after taking zidovudine (relative hazard [RH], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.72, adjusting for CD4 count, development of AIDS, and age). Fitting each drug separately, there was a larger association with reduced mortality for starting 3TC (RH, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62) than for starting ddl (RH, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93), ddC (RH, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92) or d4T (RH, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.91). These results suggest that the beneficial effect of nucleoside combination therapy identified in controlled trials can be seen in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9495224     DOI: 10.1097/00042560-199803010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol        ISSN: 1077-9450


  4 in total

Review 1.  Palliative care for HIV disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  B Greenberg; R McCorkle; D Vlahov; P A Selwyn
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Disease management--constructing optimal NRTI-based combinations: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Douglas T Dieterich
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-19

3.  AIDS-defining illnesses among patients with HIV in Singapore, 1985 to 2001: results from the Singapore HIV Observational Cohort Study (SHOCS).

Authors:  Richard Bellamy; S Sangeetha; Nicholas I Paton
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Disease Management - Constructing Optimal NRTI-Based Combinations: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Douglas T Dieterich
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 5.396

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.