Literature DB >> 9493939

Improvement in aided sound localization with open earmolds: observations in people with high-frequency hearing loss.

W Noble1, S Sinclair, D Byrne.   

Abstract

Sound localization ability was tested in nine people with marked, bilateral, high-frequency hearing loss and little or no low-frequency loss. They had previously been fitted bilaterally with behind-the-ear hearing aids and closed earmolds and showed poorer aided than unaided localization performance. Further testing was conducted in unaided and aided conditions, with the aids coupled to closed, open, and "sleeve" (extra-open) earmolds. Closed earmolds affected localization, particularly in the frontal horizontal plane, but performance was restored to unaided levels in both of the open earmold conditions. In the lateral vertical plane, localization was found to correlate with the extent of difference between low- and high-frequency hearing levels. That result is discussed in terms of a dynamic, low-frequency localization cue. Open earmolds are argued to improve aided sound localization for the present sample by permitting undistorted access to low-frequency interaural time/phase differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9493939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

3.  Head Movements Allow Listeners Bilaterally Implanted With Cochlear Implants to Resolve Front-Back Confusions.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Sarah J Natale; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

6.  A comparative study of the audiological outcomes with Retro-X (semi-implantable hearing aid system) and conventional open fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Stieve; Mark Winter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility and Sound Localization Abilities with Hearing Aids Using Binaural Wireless Technology.

Authors:  Iman Ibrahim; Vijay Parsa; Ewan Macpherson; Margaret Cheesman
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.