Literature DB >> 9493929

Detection of respiratory events during NPSG: nasal cannula/pressure sensor versus thermistor.

R G Norman1, M M Ahmed, J A Walsleben, D M Rapoport.   

Abstract

Recording of respiratory airflow is an integral part of polysomnography (NPSG). It is conventionally monitored with a thermistor that measures temperature as a surrogate of flow. The subjectivity of interpreting hypopnea from this signal has prompted us to measure nasal airflow directly with a simple pneumotachograph consisting of a standard nasal cannula connected to a 2-cm H2O pressure transducer. We manually analyzed respiratory events using simultaneous thermistor and nasal cannula in 11 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and 9 with upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS). Definite events were scored separately for each signal when amplitude was <50% for >10 seconds. Events were also scored on the nasal cannula signal when the flattened shape of the signal suggested flow limitation, and these were tabulated separately. Definite events in one signal were tabulated by whether the other signal showed a definite event or not. In addition, nasal cannula events were compared to a more liberal thermistor criterion (any change in the signal for > or = 2 breaths). Visually, events were more easily recognized on the nasal cannula signal than on the thermistor signal. In OSAS, 1,873 definite thermistor events were detected. Of these, 99.1% were detected by nasal cannula, and 0.9% were missed. Of 3,541 definite nasal cannula events, 51.9% were detected by definite thermistor criteria; 75.0% were detected by liberal thermistor criteria; 25.0% were missed. In UARS, 123 definite thermistor events were detected. Of these, 89.4% were detected by nasal cannula and 10.6% were missed. Nine hundred and three nasal cannula events were detected. However, only 17.2% of these were detected by definite thermistor criteria; 38.6% were detected by liberal thermistor criteria; 61.4% were completely undetected by thermistor. When events identified on the nasal cannula by flow limitation alone were excluded, the thermistor detected 30.1% of events by definite criteria and 78.6% by liberal criteria, still leaving 21.4% completely undetected by the thermistor. We conclude that the nasal cannula reliably detects respiratory events seen by thermistor. Additional events (including some characterized only by flow limitation) that help define the UARS, were recognized by nasal cannula but often completely missed by thermistor. We propose that respiratory monitoring during NPSG with nasal cannula significantly improves event detection and classification over that with thermistor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9493929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  28 in total

1.  The effect of respiratory scoring on the diagnosis and classification of sleep disordered breathing in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Neil R Ward; Vitor Roldao; Martin R Cowie; Stuart D Rosen; Theresa A McDonagh; Anita K Simonds; Mary J Morrell
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Positive pressure therapy: a perspective on evidence-based outcomes and methods of application.

Authors:  Mark H Sanders; Josep M Montserrat; Ramon Farré; Rachel J Givelber
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-02-15

3.  Whither the upper airway resistance syndrome?

Authors:  Noel T Johnson
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 4.  Diagnostic issues in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hiren Muzumdar; Raanan Arens
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-02-15

5.  Inspiratory flow limitation in a normal population of adults in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Luciana O Palombini; Sergio Tufik; David M Rapoport; Indu A Ayappa; Christian Guilleminault; Luciana B M de Godoy; Laura S Castro; Lia Bittencourt
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Circulation time measurement from sleep studies in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Younghoon Kwon; Talha Khan; Marc Pritzker; Conrad Iber
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  AASM criteria for scoring respiratory events: interaction between apnea sensor and hypopnea definition.

Authors:  Andrew T Thornton; Parmjit Singh; Warren R Ruehland; Peter D Rochford
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Role of morphological structure, doping, and coating of different materials in the sensing characteristics of humidity sensors.

Authors:  Ashis Tripathy; Sumit Pramanik; Jongman Cho; Jayasree Santhosh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  The new AASM criteria for scoring hypopneas: impact on the apnea hypopnea index.

Authors:  Warren R Ruehland; Peter D Rochford; Fergal J O'Donoghue; Robert J Pierce; Parmjit Singh; Andrew T Thornton
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Authors:  Richard B Berry; Rohit Budhiraja; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Vishesh K Kapur; Carole L Marcus; Reena Mehra; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; Susan Redline; Kingman P Strohl; Sally L Davidson Ward; Michelle M Tangredi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.