Literature DB >> 9493327

Asking for the indicator function of bioassays evaluating soil contamination: are bioassay results reasonable surrogates of effects on soil microflora?

K Rönnpagel1, E Janssen, W Ahlf.   

Abstract

In evaluating the biological effect of solid materials like soil a bacterial contact assay often shows higher sensitivity than elutriate testing. Results of the Bacillus cereus contact assay for some environmental important toxicants are presented in this article. A comparison with another heterotrophic soil bacterium, Arthrobacter globiformis, shows comparable sensitivity. In a bioassay approach organisms at the level of individuals or populations are exposed to soil material to determine the significance of contaminants. An investigation that incorporates community level processes in comparison with toxicity test results provides a better understanding of the indicator function of bioassays. Comparison of soil bioassays (aqueous and solid phase) with ecological parameters demonstrates the problems in predicting ecological effects of soil contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9493327     DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00374-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  2 in total

1.  Application of a sediment quality triad and different statistical approaches (Hasse diagrams and fuzzy logic) for the comparative evaluation of small streams.

Authors:  Henner Hollert; Susanne Heise; Stefan Pudenz; Rainer Brüggemann; Wolfgang Ahlf; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Solid-phase contact assay that uses a lux-marked Nitrosomonas europaea reporter strain to estimate toxicity of bioavailable linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in soil.

Authors:  Kristian K Brandt; Anders Pedersen; Jan Sørensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.