C Bergh1, I Bryman, L Nilsson, P O Janson. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To avoid a high cancellation rate and/or a high multiple pregnancy rate due to multifollicular development in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles, such cycles were converted in the same cycle to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET). The results from a four year period using this strategy are summarized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three anovulatory women (seven WHO group I, 66 WHO group II) were studied during this period. In a majority of the cycles a GnRH-analogue was used for down-regulation according to a long protocol, followed by stimulation with FSH and/or hMG. RESULTS: Out of 154 WHO group II gonadotrophin stimulation cycles intended for ovulation induction, 25 cycles were converted to IVF. The pregnancy and delivery rates in the IVF-converted cycles were 50% and 41%, respectively, and 31% and 22% when gonadotrophin stimulation was followed by intercourse. The cancellation rate, including both ovulation induction and IVF cycles, was 15% and the multiple pregnancy rate was 30%, mainly twins. Lean women achieved better outcome than obese women. In WHO group I only 12 cycles were performed. One cycle was converted to IVF resulting in delivery and one cycle was cancelled. The pregnancy- and delivery rates were both 50% when gonadotrophin stimulation was followed by intercourse. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the option to convert a gonadotrophin stimulation cycle to IVF in the same cycle, in cases of multifollicular development, seemed to be a good alternative. The conversion results in a low cancellation rate and a low incidence of high order multiple pregnancies. Patients should be informed of this opportunity before entering ovulation stimulation.
BACKGROUND: To avoid a high cancellation rate and/or a high multiple pregnancy rate due to multifollicular development in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles, such cycles were converted in the same cycle to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET). The results from a four year period using this strategy are summarized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three anovulatory women (seven WHO group I, 66 WHO group II) were studied during this period. In a majority of the cycles a GnRH-analogue was used for down-regulation according to a long protocol, followed by stimulation with FSH and/or hMG. RESULTS: Out of 154 WHO group II gonadotrophin stimulation cycles intended for ovulation induction, 25 cycles were converted to IVF. The pregnancy and delivery rates in the IVF-converted cycles were 50% and 41%, respectively, and 31% and 22% when gonadotrophin stimulation was followed by intercourse. The cancellation rate, including both ovulation induction and IVF cycles, was 15% and the multiple pregnancy rate was 30%, mainly twins. Lean women achieved better outcome than obesewomen. In WHO group I only 12 cycles were performed. One cycle was converted to IVF resulting in delivery and one cycle was cancelled. The pregnancy- and delivery rates were both 50% when gonadotrophin stimulation was followed by intercourse. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the option to convert a gonadotrophin stimulation cycle to IVF in the same cycle, in cases of multifollicular development, seemed to be a good alternative. The conversion results in a low cancellation rate and a low incidence of high order multiple pregnancies. Patients should be informed of this opportunity before entering ovulation stimulation.