BACKGROUND:Patients with ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) ST-segment depression and critical coronary narrowing are known to be at increased risk for adverse outcome, but little is known about patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing. HYPOTHESIS: The objectives of this study were to characterize the coronary angiographic pathology in patients with AECG ST-segment depression but without critical (< 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing and to compare demographic and clinical findings in these patients with those enrolled in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Study with AECG ST-segment depression and critical (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing. METHODS: Coronary angiograms from patients with AECG ST-segment depression were reviewed in a central laboratory and quantitative measurement of percent stenosis was performed. Clinical and angiographic comparisons were made between patients with and without critical coronary narrowing. RESULTS: Patients without critical coronary narrowing (n = 64) were younger (p = 0.02), less likely to be male (p < 0.001) or to have risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis or a history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), and had fewer ischemic episodes per 24 h on the screening AECG (p = 0.02) than patients with critical coronary narrowing (n = 441). Of patients without critical narrowing, one half had angiographic evidence for coronary artery disease (> or = 20% stenosis) and 60% had an ejection fraction > 70%. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing are heterogeneous, with half having measurable coronary artery disease. Demographically and clinically, they appear to be different than patients with AECG ST-segment depression with critical coronary narrowing.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) ST-segment depression and critical coronary narrowing are known to be at increased risk for adverse outcome, but little is known about patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing. HYPOTHESIS: The objectives of this study were to characterize the coronary angiographic pathology in patients with AECG ST-segment depression but without critical (< 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing and to compare demographic and clinical findings in these patients with those enrolled in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Study with AECG ST-segment depression and critical (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing. METHODS: Coronary angiograms from patients with AECG ST-segment depression were reviewed in a central laboratory and quantitative measurement of percent stenosis was performed. Clinical and angiographic comparisons were made between patients with and without critical coronary narrowing. RESULTS:Patients without critical coronary narrowing (n = 64) were younger (p = 0.02), less likely to be male (p < 0.001) or to have risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis or a history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), and had fewer ischemic episodes per 24 h on the screening AECG (p = 0.02) than patients with critical coronary narrowing (n = 441). Of patients without critical narrowing, one half had angiographic evidence for coronary artery disease (> or = 20% stenosis) and 60% had an ejection fraction > 70%. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing are heterogeneous, with half having measurable coronary artery disease. Demographically and clinically, they appear to be different than patients with AECG ST-segment depression with critical coronary narrowing.