Literature DB >> 9489986

Cardiac versus noncardiac limits to exercise after heart transplantation.

C F Notarius1, R D Levy, A Tully, D Fitchett, S Magder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the reduced exercise capacity of patients after heart transplantation is primarily a result of decreased cardiac or peripheral vascular factors, we examined the cardiac output (CO) and right atrial pressure (Pra) relation during graded cycle ergometry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 12 male patients (51.2+/-15.3 years [mean+/-SD]) 35.3+/-12.5 weeks after heart transplantation and 6 young healthy men. Patients had a normal increase in CO with increasing oxygen uptake (VO2) (CO = 0.00597 VO2 + 4.4, r = 0.83). Mean (+/-SEM) heart rate increased from 97.0+/-5.0 beats/min at rest to 146.9+/-6.9 beats/min at peak effort compared with the increase of 67.2+/-1.9 beats/min to 187.2+/-2.5 beats/min in the normal group. Pra in patients increased from 1.6+/-1.0 mm Hg at rest to 8.9+/-1.6 mm Hg during mild exercise but did not increase further at the highest work rates, even though CO continued to increase. In the normal group there was an initial increase in Pra from rest to exercise transition but little further change in Pra with increasing CO. Aerobic capacity (peak VO2) did not increase when cardiac function was increased with dobutamine during exercise in two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The steep increase in CO relative to Pra during severe exercise in patients who undergo heart transplantation argues against the heart as the sole limiting factor during maximal effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9489986     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70103-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

Review 1.  Exercise after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Claudio Marconi; Mauro Marzorati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Exercise after heart transplantation: An overview.

Authors:  Kari Nytrøen; Lars Gullestad
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-24

3.  Clinical features and determinants of VO2peak in de novo heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Katrine Rolid; Arne K Andreassen; Marianne Yardley; Elisabeth Bjørkelund; Kristjan Karason; Julia P Wigh; Christian H Dall; Finn Gustafsson; Lars Gullestad; Kari Nytrøen
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-10

4.  Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Longxiang Su; Pan Pan; Dongkai Li; Qing Zhang; Xiang Zhou; Yun Long; Xiaoting Wang; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Comments on "Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness": which parameter to assess right ventricular failure and venous congestion?

Authors:  Osama Abou-Arab; Mouhamed D Moussa; Christophe Beyls; Yazine Mahjoub
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Volume and its relationship to cardiac output and venous return.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Impact of Exercise Modalities on Peripheral and Central Components of Cardiorespiratory Capacity in Heart Transplantation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Natália Turri-Silva; Francisco Valdez Santos; Wanessa Camilly Caldas Rodrigues; Josuelir Silva Freire; Lawrence C Cahalin; Kenneth Verboven; João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan; Dominique Hansen; Gerson Cipriano
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.