Literature DB >> 9489588

The population pharmacokinetics of recombinant- and urinary-human follicle stimulating hormone in women.

M O Karlsson1, J R Wade, E Loumaye, A Munafo.   

Abstract

AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of recombinant-human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) and urinary-human follicle stimulating hormone (u-hFSH) using population pharmacokinetic analysis and deconvolution techniques.
METHODS: Sparse data were available from 62 female patients who received u-hFSH intramuscularly (i.m.) and 60 female patients who received r-hFSH subcutaneously (s.c.) as part of an in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) procedure. The dose of u-hFSH and r-hFSH was 225 International Units (IU) FSH/day for the first 5 days of treatment. The dose of u-hFSH/r-hFSH on subsequent days depended upon the ovarian response. Intensively sampled data were also available from 12 female volunteers who received r-hFSH, 150 IU, on three occasions: intravenously (i.v.), i.m. and s.c., each separated by 1 week of wash-out. The volunteers then received multiple r-hFSH doses by the s.c. route: 150 IU once daily for 7 days. Intensively sampled data were available from a further 12 female volunteers who received u-hFSH, 150 IU, given by the i.v. and i.m. routes.
RESULTS: Analysis of the intensively sampled r-hFSH and u-hFSH data sets found that disposition could be described using a two-compartment model and that absorption was rate limiting and essentially a first order process, for both compounds. The population estimate of clearance (CL) after i.v. administration was 0.60 and 0.44 l h(-1) for r-hFSH and u-hFSH respectively. The calculated mean residence times (MRT) for r-hFSH and u-hFSH were 16 and 18 h, respectively. The different bioavailabilities (F) and mean absorption times (MAT) determined after i.m. and s.c. administration ranged from 0.60 to 0.77 and from 27 h to 48 h, depending on compound, administration route, data type and method of analysis. Population analysis of the sparse patient data found that a one compartment model with first order absorption was adequate to describe the r-hFSH and u-hFSH data. The population estimates of apparent clearance (CL/F) were 0.71 and 0.33 l h(-1) for r-hFSH and u-hFSH respectively. Urinary-hFSH CL/F increased linearly with weight and was 0.33 l h(-1) at the average weight of 58.5 kg. No other covariates (age, weight, height, creatinine clearance, body mass index, race) were found to influence the FSH disposition parameters. The sparse data population estimates of intersubject variability in CL/F for r-hFSH and u-hFSH were essentially the same, 26% and 25%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The population analysis indicates that the variability in CL/F is moderate, consequently, so would be the variability in exposure, given a fixed dosage regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9489588      PMCID: PMC1873998          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00644.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  9 in total

1.  Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D Verotta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 3.  Human follicle-stimulating hormone produced by recombinant DNA technology: a review for clinicians.

Authors:  E Loumaye; R Campbell; J Salat-Baroux
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics of endogenous substances: some problems and some solutions.

Authors:  A Marzo; A Rescigno
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). I. Comparative pharmacokinetics with urinary human FSH.

Authors:  J Y le Cotonnec; H C Porchet; V Beltrami; A Khan; S Toon; M Rowland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. II. Single doses and steady state pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J Y le Contonnec; H C Porchet; V Beltrami; A Khan; S Toon; M Rowland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The program for in vitro fertilization at Norfolk.

Authors:  H W Jones; G S Jones; M C Andrews; A Acosta; C Bundren; J Garcia; B Sandow; L Veeck; C Wilkes; J Witmyer; J E Wortham; G Wright
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Clinical assessment of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in stimulating ovarian follicular development before in vitro fertilization. Recombinant Human FSH Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone after intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous administration in monkeys, and comparison with intravenous administration of urinary follicle stimulating hormone.

Authors:  H C Porchet; J Y Le Cotonnec; S Canali; G Zanolo
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.922

  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Flip-flop pharmacokinetics--delivering a reversal of disposition: challenges and opportunities during drug development.

Authors:  Jaime A Yáñez; Connie M Remsberg; Casey L Sayre; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Suraj G Bhansali; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Approaches to handling pharmacodynamic baseline responses.

Authors:  Chantaratsamon Dansirikul; Hanna E Silber; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Model-Based Residual Post-Processing for Residual Model Identification.

Authors:  Moustafa M A Ibrahim; Rikard Nordgren; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Low estradiol responses in oocyte donors undergoing gonadotropin stimulation do not influence clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine L Palmerola; Briana J Rudick; Rogerio A Lobo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Recombinant follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-02-04

7.  Testing for Ovarian Reserve in Assisted Reproduction programs: the current point of view.

Authors:  F J Broekmans
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

8.  Variability Attribution for Automated Model Building.

Authors:  Moustafa M A Ibrahim; Rikard Nordgren; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Characterisation of Population Pharmacokinetics and Endogenous Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels After Multiple Dosing of a Recombinant Human FSH (FE 999049) in Healthy Women.

Authors:  Trine Høyer Rose; Daniel Röshammar; Lars Erichsen; Lars Grundemar; Johnny T Ottesen
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2016-06

10.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of FE 999049, a Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, in Healthy Women After Single Ascending Doses.

Authors:  Trine Høyer Rose; Daniel Röshammar; Lars Erichsen; Lars Grundemar; Johnny T Ottesen
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.