AIMS: This study aims to identify the physical harm associated with injecting drug use and examine the treatment-seeking behaviour of injecting drug users (IDUs). Specific attention is given to the factors associated with presentation and non-presentation of injecting-related problems. DESIGN: Participants were interviewed by research staff using a semi-structured questionnaire, then physically examined by a medical team. SETTING: Needles exchanges in Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twelve injecting drug users. FINDINGS: Respondents' accounts of their current injecting-related problems were found to be consistent with the clinician's findings, suggesting that IDUs are able to self-diagnose injecting-related harm. However, almost three-quarters had not sought help for these problems. Qualitative data suggest the main reasons for non-presentation, or delayed presentation, of injecting-related problems are normalization of injecting-related harm and a reluctance to attend available services. Almost half of those seeking treatment for injecting-related problems did so during an emergency or crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Low threshold services, such as needle exchanges, may have to take a more proactive stance to encourage injectors to present with injecting-related problems. This may help reduce injecting-related harms, especially the resulting medical complications, which would in turn relieve the pressure on other services such as hospital Accident and Emergency Departments.
AIMS: This study aims to identify the physical harm associated with injecting drug use and examine the treatment-seeking behaviour of injecting drug users (IDUs). Specific attention is given to the factors associated with presentation and non-presentation of injecting-related problems. DESIGN:Participants were interviewed by research staff using a semi-structured questionnaire, then physically examined by a medical team. SETTING: Needles exchanges in Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twelve injecting drug users. FINDINGS: Respondents' accounts of their current injecting-related problems were found to be consistent with the clinician's findings, suggesting that IDUs are able to self-diagnose injecting-related harm. However, almost three-quarters had not sought help for these problems. Qualitative data suggest the main reasons for non-presentation, or delayed presentation, of injecting-related problems are normalization of injecting-related harm and a reluctance to attend available services. Almost half of those seeking treatment for injecting-related problems did so during an emergency or crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Low threshold services, such as needle exchanges, may have to take a more proactive stance to encourage injectors to present with injecting-related problems. This may help reduce injecting-related harms, especially the resulting medical complications, which would in turn relieve the pressure on other services such as hospital Accident and Emergency Departments.
Authors: Harout K Tossonian; Brian Conway; Jesse D Raffa; Mark Viljoen; Milan Khara; Annabel Mead; Heather Culbert; Stanley Devlaming Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Marie-Josée Fleury; Guy Grenier; Jean-Marie Bamvita; Michel Perreault; Jean Caron Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Kristina T Phillips; Bradley J Anderson; Debra S Herman; Jane M Liebschutz; Michael D Stein Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Charles Irish; Roy Maxwell; Mark Dancox; Paul Brown; Caroline Trotter; Julia Verne; Mary Shaw Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.883