Literature DB >> 9488612

Acute myeloid leukaemia expressing the leucocyte integrin CD11b-a new leukaemic syndrome with poor prognosis: result of an ECOG database analysis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

E Paietta1, J Andersen, J Yunis, J M Rowe, P A Cassileth, M S Tallman, J M Bennett, P H Wiernik.   

Abstract

While assessing the prognostic implications of immunophenotyping in 382 patients enrolled in treatment protocols of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) for de novo adult acute myeloid leukaemia, we identified 95 patients with a unique antigen profile characterized by high expression of the leucocyte integrin CD11b (CD11b+ AML). High expression of CD11b was defined as > or = 32% positive blasts based on the retrospectively established prognostic cut-off point for this antigen. Although CD11b is normally expressed by mature monocytes, natural killer cells and granulocytes, leukaemic blasts in CD11b+ AML lacked other immunologic monocytic features (e.g. CD14 and CD122, the interleukin-2 receptor beta chain) and demonstrated a high degree of immaturity, as reflected by a high incidence of blasts expressing the stem cell factor receptor, CD117, and few blasts positive for the myeloid differentiation antigen CD15. Furthermore, by FAB criteria, only 41% of CD11b+ AML cases were classified as M4/M5. Patients with CD11b+ AML had a low response rate (54%) when compared with acute monocytic leukaemia (AMOL; 82%, P = 0.006) or AML overall (68%, P = 0.031), independent of age, cytogenetic abnormalities and P-glycoprotein expression. Because of its poor prognosis, recognition of CD11b+ AML is clinically warranted and, given its morphologic and cytogenetic ambiguity, must be based on the unique antigen profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9488612     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  6 in total

1.  Significant association between expression of the CD11b surface molecule and favorable outcome for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Zahra Amirghofran; Maryam Zakerinia; Azra Shamseddin
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Spontaneous cell fusion of acute leukemia cells and macrophages observed in cells with leukemic potential.

Authors:  Ines Martin-Padura; Paola Marighetti; Giuliana Gregato; Alice Agliano; Omar Malazzi; Patrizia Mancuso; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Viale; Francesco Bertolini
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Prognostic implications of CD14 positivity in acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yunsuk Choi; Je-Hwan Lee; Sung-Doo Kim; Dae-Young Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Miee Seol; Young-Ah Kang; Mijin Jeon; Ah Rang Jung; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Failure of three novel regimens to improve outcome for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a report from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Mark R Litzow; Megan Othus; Larry D Cripe; Steven D Gore; Hillard M Lazarus; Sandra J Lee; John M Bennett; Elisabeth M Paietta; Gordon W Dewald; Jacob M Rowe; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  CD25 expression status improves prognostic risk classification in AML independent of established biomarkers: ECOG phase 3 trial, E1900.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen; Zhuoxin Sun; Maria E Figueroa; Jay P Patel; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Janis Racevskis; Rhett P Ketterling; Hugo Fernandez; Jacob M Rowe; Martin S Tallman; Ari Melnick; Ross L Levine; Elisabeth Paietta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prognostic Value of CD11b Expression Level for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuangnian Xu; Xi Li; Jianmin Zhang; Jieping Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.