Literature DB >> 9488071

Percutaneous transperineal radiofrequency ablation of prostate tumour: safety, feasibility and pathological effects on human prostate cancer.

A R Zlotta1, B Djavan, C Matos, J C Noel, M O Peny, D E Silverman, M Marberger, C C Schulman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivered interstitially in patients with prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy and to correlate the proposed theoretical lesion size with the pathological findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Radiofrequency interstitial tumour ablation (RITA) was performed in 15 patients with localized prostate cancer before radical surgery. RF energy was delivered to the prostate by active needle electrodes (monopolar or bipolar) placed transperineally under transrectal ultrasonography guidance. Needle electrodes were used with different configurations and in some cases were covered by retractable shields to vary the length and circumference of the thermal lesions created. In eight patients, the procedure was performed immediately before radical prostatectomy, in six RITA was performed under spinal anaesthesia 1 week before surgery and in one patient, no surgery was performed but the patient was followed by serial determinations of prostate specific antigen (PSA). At least two lesions were created in each prostate, including both capsule and peripheral zones. NADPH and haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining were used to assess the extent of the necrotic lesion in the radical prostatectomy specimen.
RESULTS: The mean energy delivered was 10.5 kJ, with central temperatures reaching up to 105 degrees C during 12 min of ablation; rectal temperature remained at < 38 degrees C. There were no complications. Macroscopic examination showed well-demarcated lesions including the prostatic capsule, up to 2.2 x 1.5 x 4.5 cm. With monopolar energy, the observed lesion size was comparable to the predicted 2 x 2 x 2 cm lesion, while with bipolar energy, lesion size was related to interneedle distance and uncovered needle length. Microscopic examination showed clearly delineated lesions both with NADPH (in prostates immediately removed after surgery) and H&amp;E (at 1 week after RITA) staining. The lesion size observed on pathological analysis correlated with the predicted lesion size. In one patient, no residual cancer was found in the specimen. In the patient whose entire prostate was targeted and followed by serial PSA measurements, the latter were undetectable at 3 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Transperineally delivered RF energy is capable of safely creating extensive coagulative necrotic lesions in prostate cancer tissue, in a reproducible and controlled manner. The results presented here provide basic information for the potential future application of this form of energy for localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9488071     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  25 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation: a novel approach for treatment of metastatic pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  K Pacak; T Fojo; D S Goldstein; G Eisenhofer; M M Walther; W M Linehan; L Bachenheimer; J Abraham; B J Wood
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Twelve-month prostate volume reduction after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of the prostate.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; M B Wolf; M C Roethke; S Pahernik; B A Hadaschik; G Hatiboglu; T H Kuru; I V Popeneciu; J L Chin; M Billia; J Relle; J Hafron; K R Nandalur; R M Staruch; M Burtnyk; M Hohenfellner; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Percutaneous tumor ablation with radiofrequency.

Authors:  Bradford J Wood; Jeffrey R Ramkaransingh; Tito Fojo; McClellan M Walther; Stephen K Libutti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Palliative radiofrequency ablation for recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gaurav Jindal; Marc Friedman; Julia Locklin; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Ablative options for prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa; Lucas Teixeira Batista; Xavier Cathelineau; Javier Sanchez-Macias; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

6.  Comparative study of conventional US, contrast enhanced US and enhanced MR for the follow-up of prostatic radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Chao Feng; Bin Hu; Bing Hu; Lei Chen; Jia Li; Jin Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 8.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nishanth Krishnananthan; Uri Lindner; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR evaluation of prostate cancer before and after endorectal high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  R Del Vescovo; F Pisanti; V Russo; S Battisti; R L Cazzato; F D'Agostino; F Giurazza; C C Quattrocchi; E Faiella; R Setola; R Giulianelli; R F Grasso; B Beomonte Zobel
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.