BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that total daily energy expenditure (TDE) is increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and it was hypothesised that these patients may have a decreased mechanical efficiency during activities. The purpose of the present study was to measure the mechanical efficiency of submaximal leg exercise, and to characterise patients with a potentially low efficiency in terms of body composition, resting energy expenditure, lung function, and symptom limited exercise performance. METHODS: Metabolic and ventilatory variables were measured breath by breath during submaximal cycle ergometry exercise performed at 50% of symptom limited achieved maximal load in 33 clinically stable patients with COPD (23 men) with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 40 (12)% predicted. Net mechanical efficiency was calculated adjusting for resting energy expenditure (REE). RESULTS: Median mechanical efficiency was 15.5% and ranged from 8.5% to 22.7%. Patients with an extremely low mechanical efficiency (< 17%, n = 21) demonstrated an increased VO2/VE compared with those with a normal efficiency (median difference 4.7 ml/l, p = 0.005) during submaximal exercise. There was no difference between the groups differentiated by mechanical efficiency in blood gas tensions at rest, airflow obstruction, respiratory muscle strength, hyperinflation at rest, resting energy expenditure or body composition. There was a significant difference in total airways resistance (92% predicted, p = 0.03) between the groups differentiated by mechanical efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that many patients with severe COPD have decreased mechanical efficiency. Furthermore, based on the results of this study it is hypothesised that an increased oxygen cost of breathing during exercise contributes to the decreased mechanical efficiency.
BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that total daily energy expenditure (TDE) is increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and it was hypothesised that these patients may have a decreased mechanical efficiency during activities. The purpose of the present study was to measure the mechanical efficiency of submaximal leg exercise, and to characterise patients with a potentially low efficiency in terms of body composition, resting energy expenditure, lung function, and symptom limited exercise performance. METHODS: Metabolic and ventilatory variables were measured breath by breath during submaximal cycle ergometry exercise performed at 50% of symptom limited achieved maximal load in 33 clinically stable patients with COPD (23 men) with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 40 (12)% predicted. Net mechanical efficiency was calculated adjusting for resting energy expenditure (REE). RESULTS: Median mechanical efficiency was 15.5% and ranged from 8.5% to 22.7%. Patients with an extremely low mechanical efficiency (< 17%, n = 21) demonstrated an increased VO2/VE compared with those with a normal efficiency (median difference 4.7 ml/l, p = 0.005) during submaximal exercise. There was no difference between the groups differentiated by mechanical efficiency in blood gas tensions at rest, airflow obstruction, respiratory muscle strength, hyperinflation at rest, resting energy expenditure or body composition. There was a significant difference in total airways resistance (92% predicted, p = 0.03) between the groups differentiated by mechanical efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that many patients with severe COPD have decreased mechanical efficiency. Furthermore, based on the results of this study it is hypothesised that an increased oxygen cost of breathing during exercise contributes to the decreased mechanical efficiency.
Authors: D M Russell; P M Walker; L A Leiter; A A Sima; W K Tanner; D A Mickle; J Whitwell; E B Marliss; K N Jeejeebhoy Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1984-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: F Maltais; P LeBlanc; C Simard; J Jobin; C Bérubé; J Bruneau; L Carrier; R Belleau Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jayson R Gifford; Joel D Trinity; Gwenael Layec; Ryan S Garten; Song-Young Park; Matthew J Rossman; Steen Larsen; Flemming Dela; Russell S Richardson Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-08-13
Authors: Gwenael Layec; Luke J Haseler; Jan Hoff; Russell S Richardson Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Karin J C Sanders; Roel Wierts; Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt; Judith de Vos-Geelen; Guy Plasqui; Marco C J M Kelders; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling; Jan Bucerius; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Felix M Mottaghy; Annemie M W J Schols Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Hans Van Remoortel; Yogini Raste; Zafeiris Louvaris; Santiago Giavedoni; Chris Burtin; Daniel Langer; Frederick Wilson; Roberto Rabinovich; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Thierry Troosters Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240