Literature DB >> 9485498

Measures of threading specificity and accuracy.

A Marchler-Bauer1, S H Bryant.   

Abstract

Threading predictions for CASP2 target proteins were compared to their true structures using a series of precisely defined measures of agreement, calculated in a fully automatic way. Fold recognition specificity was calculated as the proportion of a predictor's "bet" that was placed on previously-known structures similar to the prediction target, as identified by a "jury" of well-tested structure-structure comparison methods. Values approaching 100% indicate that a prediction correctly identified the structural and/or evolutionary family to which a target belongs. Alignment specificity was calculated as the proportion of aligned residue paris in the predicted target-to-known-structure alignment that also occur in the structure-structure alignments produced by the "jury" methods. Contact specificity was calculated as the proportion of nonlocal residue contacts in the molecular model implied by threading alignment, that also occur in the experimental structure of the target. Alignment specificity and contact specificity measure the accuracy of a predicted 3-dimensional model. Values approaching 100% indicate that target residues have been assigned to the correct spatial locations and that the model is as accurate as possible for a threading prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9485498     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1997)1+<74::aid-prot11>3.3.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of PSI-BLAST alignment accuracy in comparison to structural alignments.

Authors:  I Friedberg; T Kaplan; H Margalit
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.

Authors:  J Jung; B Lee
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evolutionary plasticity of protein families: coupling between sequence and structure variation.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Yuri I Wolf; Larisa A Panchenko; Thomas Madej
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-15

6.  A study of quality measures for protein threading models.

Authors:  S Cristobal; A Zemla; D Fischer; L Rychlewski; A Elofsson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  MMDB and VAST+: tracking structural similarities between macromolecular complexes.

Authors:  Thomas Madej; Christopher J Lanczycki; Dachuan Zhang; Paul A Thiessen; Renata C Geer; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Accuracy of structure-based sequence alignment of automatic methods.

Authors:  Changhoon Kim; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.