Literature DB >> 9485238

Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.

H Reichenspurner1, V Gulielmos, J Wunderlich, M Dangel, F M Wagner, M F Pompili, J H Stevens, J Ludwig, W G Daniel, S Schüler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce surgical trauma, we performed minimally invasive Port-Access (Heartport Inc, Redwood City, CA) coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.
METHODS: Thirty-six men and 6 women with a median age of 59 years (range, 31 to 75 years) and isolated lesions of the left anterior descending branch of the coronary artery underwent Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting. A small (6- to 9-cm) incision was made parasternally on top of the fourth rib. The left internal thoracic (mammary) artery was dissected and taken down through the minithoracotomy either alone or using an additional thoracoscopic approach. Cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted through femoral cannulation, and an additional endoarterial balloon catheter (Heartport Inc) was introduced into the ascending aorta for aortic occlusion, aortic root venting, and the delivery of cold antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia. After cardioplegic arrest, the left internal mammary artery was anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery under direct vision.
RESULTS: The median left internal mammary artery takedown time was 49.5 +/- 21.9 minutes, the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 59.5 +/- 32.8 minutes, the aortic occlusion time was 28.5 +/- 7.9 minutes, the intensive care unit stay was 1.0 +/- 3.2 days, and the total hospital stay was 5.0 +/- 2.5 days. Intraoperative angiograms were done in the first 10 patients and showed patent left internal mammary artery grafts without anastomotic complications in all cases. Two arterial dissections, including one aortic dissection, were observed in patients with preexisting peripheral vascular disease. The other complications were minor. All but 1 patient recovered well, with no major limitations in their daily activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Using this minimally invasive method, sternotomy-related complications can be avoided, the hospital stay can be reduced, and a safe coronary artery bypass grafting procedure can be performed with the advantage of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest as are used routinely in conventional coronary artery operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9485238     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01154-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multivessel coronary bypass grafting with minimal access using cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  M Groh; E A Grossi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Treatment of coronary heart disease with minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M A Wait
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2000-04

Review 3.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M J Mack
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Anesthetic issues for robotic cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Wendy K Bernstein; Andrew Walker
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; Stephanie Wallner; Ingo Crailsheim; Martin Grabenwöger; Bernhard Winkler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fabiana Lucà; Leen van Garsse; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Orlando Parise; Mark La Meir; Calogero Puntrello; Gaspare Rubino; Rocco Carella; Roberto Lorusso; Gian Franco Gensini; Jos G Maessen; Sandro Gelsomino
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-03-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.