Literature DB >> 9484280

Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assist patients and their physicians in arriving at the most effective follow-up strategy after treatment for breast cancer. OUTCOMES: Survival, metastasis-free survival, local recurrence, quality of life. EVIDENCE: Evidence was based on a literature review using MEDLINE for the years 1991 to 1996, references cited in reviews and consensus conference proceedings. RECOMMENDATIONS: All patients who have completed their primary treatment for breast cancer should have regular follow-up surveillance. The frequency of follow-up visits should be adjusted according to individual patient's needs. The following issues and schedule should be considered: (a) The need to discuss and manage early side effects of therapy, plan a follow-up program and provide general support. (This visit is usually scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after therapy.) (b) The need to establish a post-treatment baseline, detect early recurrences and teach breast self-examination. (This visit is usually 4 to 6 months after therapy.) (c) The need for regular physical and mammographic examination to detect potentially curable disease. (These examinations should be at approximately 1-year intervals indefinitely thereafter.) (d) The need to provide support and counselling may require additional visits for some women, particularly for the first few years. (e) If metastases develop, the frequency of visits must be determined by the symptoms, course of disease and need for further treatment. All visits should include a medical history. For women who are taking tamoxifen, it is important to ask about vaginal bleeding. Physical examination should include both breasts, regional lymph nodes, chest wall and abdomen. The arms should be examined for lymphedema. Annual visits should include mammographic examination. Routine laboratory and radiographic investigations should not be carried out for the purpose of detecting distant metastases. Patients should be encouraged to report new, persistent symptoms promptly, without waiting for the next scheduled appointment. Breast self-examination should be taught to those women who wish to carry it out. Psychosocial support should be encouraged and facilitated. Participation in clinical trials should be facilitated and encouraged. The responsibility for follow-up care should be formally allocated to a single physician, with the patient participating as much as possible. The patients should always be fully informed of these arrangements. Communication between all members of the therapeutic team must be ensured to avoid duplication of visits and tests. VALIDATION: Successive reviews and revisions of this document were carried out by a writing committee, expert primary reviewers, secondary reviewers from across Canada, and by the Steering Committee. This final version reflects a substantial consensus of all individuals involved. This guideline has been reviewed and approved by the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9484280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; David C Hodgson; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Rahim Moineddin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update).

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind; Mark Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Quality of post-treatment surveillance of early stage breast cancer in Texas.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Gabriela M Vargas; Yimei Han; Celia Chao; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: Importance of communication.

Authors:  Julie Easley; Baukje Miedema; June C Carroll; Donna P Manca; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fiona Webster; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Is symptom-oriented follow-up still up to date?

Authors:  Christoph Mundhenke; Volker Moebus
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Baseline staging tests in primary breast cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  R E Myers; M Johnston; K Pritchard; M Levine; T Oliver
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Should breast cancer survivors be excluded from, or invited to, organised mammography screening programmes?

Authors:  Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Evaluating surveillance breast imaging and biopsy in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julie Weiss; Roberta Diflorio; Todd Mackenzie; Martha Goodrich; Steven Poplack
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-14

Review 9.  Alternative methods of follow up in breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D A Montgomery; K Krupa; T G Cooke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience.

Authors:  D A Montgomery; K Krupa; W J L Jack; G R Kerr; I H Kunkler; J Thomas; J M Dixon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.