Literature DB >> 9483299

A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation.

K S Lee1, M S Dunn, M Fenwick, A T Shennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: As the result of vigorous bubbling, infants receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by an underwater seal (bubble CPAP) were observed to have vibrations of their chests at frequencies similar to high-frequency ventilation (HFV). We performed a randomized crossover study in 10 premature infants ready for extubation to test whether bubble CPAP contributes to gas exchange compared to conventional ventilator-derived CPAP. Measurements of tidal volume and minute volume were made using the Bear Cub neonatal volume monitor, and gas exchange was measured using an oxygen saturation monitor and a transcutaneous carbon dioxide (tcpCO2) monitor.
RESULTS: There was a 39% reduction in minute volume (p < 0.001) and a 7% reduction in respiratory rate (p = 0.004) with no change in tcpCO2 or O2 saturation for infants supported with bubble versus ventilator-derived CPAP.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference in blood gas parameters associated with a decrease in the infant's minute volume and respiratory rate with bubble CPAP compared with ventilator-derived CPAP suggests that the chest vibrations produced with bubble CPAP may have contributed to gas exchange. Bubble CPAP may offer an effective and inexpensive option for providing respiratory support to premature infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9483299     DOI: 10.1159/000013962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Neonate        ISSN: 0006-3126


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  CPAP review.

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Catherine J Wedderburn; Donovan Duffy; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Safety and effectiveness of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress.

Authors:  S S Mathai; A Rajeev; K M Adhikari
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of Bubble and Ventilator Derived Nasal CPAP in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates with Respiratory Distress.

Authors:  Sheetal Agarwal; Arti Maria; Mahesh K Roy; Ankit Verma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sucheta Yadav; Anu Thukral; M Jeeva Sankar; V Sreenivas; Ashok K Deorari; Vinod K Paul; Ramesh Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Impact of implementing 5 potentially better respiratory practices on neonatal outcomes and costs.

Authors:  Bernadette M Levesque; Leslie A Kalish; Justine LaPierre; Maureen Welch; Virginia Porter
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Use of Nasal Bubble CPAP in Children with Hypoxemic Clinical Pneumonia-Report from a Resource Limited Set-Up.

Authors:  Muralidharan Jayashree; H B KiranBabu; Sunit Singhi; Karthi Nallasamy
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.165

8.  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: pathophysiology and management strategies.

Authors:  Carl T D'Angio; William M Maniscalco
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions.

Authors:  Fernando C Barros; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta; Maneesh Batra; Thomas N Hansen; Cesar G Victora; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters.

Authors:  Thomas Hückstädt; Bertram Foitzik; Roland R Wauer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.