Literature DB >> 9483178

Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.

E A Burgstaler1, A A Pineda, P Wollan.   

Abstract

In this study we compare processing times and platelet yields of eight systems: five double-needle (DN)--Fenwal CS3000 Plus with interface offset (IO) of 6 (Fen 6) and IO of 10 (Fen 10), a prototype Fenwal Amicus (AM-DN), Spectra version 4 (Spec 4-DN) and version 5 with leukoreduction system (Spec 5-LRS); and three single-needle (SN) systems--Haemonetics MCS Plus (MCS+), prototype Amicus (AM-SN), and Spectra version 4 (Spec 4-SN). Twenty-five procedures from each of the systems (except AM-SN, N = 13) were compared; each system had comparable preprocedure platelet counts and similar endpoints. Five systems--MCS+, Fen 6, Fen 10 with leukoreduction filter (MCS + LRF), (Fen 6 LRF), (Fen 10 LRF), as well as AM-DN, and Spec 5-LRS--were compared for WBC content. P-selectin expression was compared in the MCS+; Fen-10 with A-35 (Fen 10-A35) and PLT-30 (Fen 10-PLT30) collection chambers; Spec 4-DN; and platelet-rich plasma. We found AM-DN (63 +/- 16 min) had a significantly lower average processing time than all other systems except AM-SN. Spectra 4-DN (5.6 +/- 1.7 x 10(11) Plt) produced significantly more platelets and had a significantly higher incidence of products > or = 6.0 x 10(11) (56%) and higher incidence of products > or = 6.6 x 10(11) Plt (32%) than all other systems. AM-DN (0.073 +/- 0.017 x 10(11) Plt/min) had a significantly higher collection rate than all other systems except AM-SN. The WBC content comparison indicated MCS+ with a filter; and AM-DN and Spectra 5-LRS without filters were capable of consistently (99.32-100%) producing products with < 5 x 10(6) WBC, but were less consistent (86.36-99.26%) at < 1 x 10(6) WBC. MCS+ and Fen 10-PLT30 had significantly (p < .05) less p-selectin expression than all other systems but not between each other. From the data in this study, if leukoreduced platelets were needed in the shortest processing time, the first and second choices would be Amicus-DN and Spectra 5-LRS, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9483178     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:4<170::aid-jca3>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.

Authors:  Fevzi Altuntas; Ismail Sari; Ismail Kocyigit; Leylagul Kaynar; Sibel Hacioglu; Ahmet Ozturk; Mehmet Oztekin; Musa Solmaz; Bulent Eser; Mustafa Cetin; Ali Unal
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Single-donor platelet apheresis: observational comparison of the new Haemonetics Universal Platelet protocol with the previous Concentrated Single Donor Platelet protocol.

Authors:  Ugo Salvadori; Cosetta Minelli; Bianca Graziotin; Ivo Gentilini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Platelet Recruitment during Multiple Donor Platelet Apheresis Differs between Cell Separators.

Authors:  Stefano Fontana; Peter Keller; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Initial values of donor hematocrit and efficiency of plateletpheresis.

Authors:  Elvedin Landzo; Alma Sofo-Hafizovic; Vesna Cetkovic-Basic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.