G H Swingler1, G D Hussey, M Zwarenstein. 1. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When available, chest radiographs are used widely in acute lower-respiratory-tract infections in children. Their impact on clinical outcome is unknown. METHODS:522 children aged 2 to 59 months who met the WHO case definition for pneumonia were randomly allocated to have a chest radiograph or not. The main outcome was time to recovery, measured in a subset of 295 patients contactable by telephone. Subsidiary outcomes included diagnosis, management, and subsequent use of health facilities. FINDINGS: There was a marginal improvement in time to recovery which was not clinically significant. The median time to recovery was 7 days in both groups (95% CI 6-8 days and 6-9 days in the radiograph and control groups respectively, p=0.50, log-rank test) and the hazard ratio for recovery was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.34). This lack of effect was not modified by clinicians' experience and no subgroups were identified in which the chest radiograph had an effect. Pneumonia and upper-respiratory infections were diagnosed more often and bronchiolitis less often in the radiograph group. Antibiotic use was higher in the radiograph group (60.8% vs 52.2%, p=0.05). There was no difference in subsequent use of health facilities. INTERPRETATION:Chest radiograph did not affect clinical outcome in outpatient children with acute lower-respiratory infection. This lack of effect is independent of clinicians' experience. There are no clinically identifiable subgroups of children within the WHO case definition of pneumonia who are likely to benefit from a chest radiograph. We conclude that routine use of chest radiography is not beneficial in ambulatory children aged over 2 months with acute lower-respiratory-tract infection.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: When available, chest radiographs are used widely in acute lower-respiratory-tract infections in children. Their impact on clinical outcome is unknown. METHODS: 522 children aged 2 to 59 months who met the WHO case definition for pneumonia were randomly allocated to have a chest radiograph or not. The main outcome was time to recovery, measured in a subset of 295 patients contactable by telephone. Subsidiary outcomes included diagnosis, management, and subsequent use of health facilities. FINDINGS: There was a marginal improvement in time to recovery which was not clinically significant. The median time to recovery was 7 days in both groups (95% CI 6-8 days and 6-9 days in the radiograph and control groups respectively, p=0.50, log-rank test) and the hazard ratio for recovery was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.34). This lack of effect was not modified by clinicians' experience and no subgroups were identified in which the chest radiograph had an effect. Pneumonia and upper-respiratory infections were diagnosed more often and bronchiolitis less often in the radiograph group. Antibiotic use was higher in the radiograph group (60.8% vs 52.2%, p=0.05). There was no difference in subsequent use of health facilities. INTERPRETATION: Chest radiograph did not affect clinical outcome in outpatientchildren with acute lower-respiratory infection. This lack of effect is independent of clinicians' experience. There are no clinically identifiable subgroups of children within the WHO case definition of pneumonia who are likely to benefit from a chest radiograph. We conclude that routine use of chest radiography is not beneficial in ambulatory children aged over 2 months with acute lower-respiratory-tract infection.
Entities:
Keywords:
Africa; Africa South Of The Sahara; Age Factors; Case Control Studies; Child; Child Health; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diseases; English Speaking Africa; Examinations And Diagnoses; Health; Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Population; Population Characteristics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Respiratory Infections; South Africa; Southern Africa; Studies; Treatment; Youth
Authors: John S Bradley; Carrie L Byington; Samir S Shah; Brian Alverson; Edward R Carter; Christopher Harrison; Sheldon L Kaplan; Sharon E Mace; George H McCracken; Matthew R Moore; Shawn D St Peter; Jana A Stockwell; Jack T Swanson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Amy Millicent Y Cao; Joleen P Choy; Lakshmi Narayana Mohanakrishnan; Roger F Bain; Mieke L van Driel Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-12-26
Authors: J C Buñuel Alvarez; C Vila Pablos; J Heredia Quiciós; M Lloveras Clos; X Basurto Oña; E Gómez Martinench; J Pont Vallès Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 1.137