T Kodama1, K Watanabe. 1. Department of Radiology, Miyazaki Medical College, Japan. tkodama@post1.miyazaki-med.ac.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of imaging parameters (TR and flip angle), velocity and pulsatility of flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (3D TOF MR) angiography by using a flow phantom. METHODS: The 3D TOF MR angiography of a flow phantom was performed at 1.5-T with various TRs, flip angles and flow velocity. The influence of pulsatile flow was also evaluated. RESULTS: The imaging parameters and flow velocity affected the saturation effects of inflowing spins. Signal loss due to saturation of inflowing spins was more pronounced with a shorter TR, larger flip angle, or lower flow velocity. However signal intensity of stationary tissue were more suppressed with a shorter TR resulting in a larger signal difference to noise ratio of the flowing fluid. Velocity of the flow also affected the signal loss due to intravoxel phase dispersion, which was apparently observed with a stenotic tube. Pulsatility of flow resulted in decreased intensity of flowing fluid and in ghost artifacts along the phase-encoding and slice-select directions. The spacing between these ghosts and intensity of them were dependent on TR, flip angle and pulse rates. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the influence of imaging parameters and flow characteristics is essential for evaluating the MR angiograms or for improving their quality.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of imaging parameters (TR and flip angle), velocity and pulsatility of flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (3D TOF MR) angiography by using a flow phantom. METHODS: The 3D TOF MR angiography of a flow phantom was performed at 1.5-T with various TRs, flip angles and flow velocity. The influence of pulsatile flow was also evaluated. RESULTS: The imaging parameters and flow velocity affected the saturation effects of inflowing spins. Signal loss due to saturation of inflowing spins was more pronounced with a shorter TR, larger flip angle, or lower flow velocity. However signal intensity of stationary tissue were more suppressed with a shorter TR resulting in a larger signal difference to noise ratio of the flowing fluid. Velocity of the flow also affected the signal loss due to intravoxel phase dispersion, which was apparently observed with a stenotic tube. Pulsatility of flow resulted in decreased intensity of flowing fluid and in ghost artifacts along the phase-encoding and slice-select directions. The spacing between these ghosts and intensity of them were dependent on TR, flip angle and pulse rates. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the influence of imaging parameters and flow characteristics is essential for evaluating the MR angiograms or for improving their quality.
Authors: X Ge; H Zhao; Z Zhou; X Li; B Sun; H Wu; J Wan; J Xu; J P Villablanca; X Liu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Grigorios Korosoglou; Saurabh Shah; Evert-Jan Vonken; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; Lijun Tang; Dara L Kraitchman; Raymond C Boston; David E Sosnovik; Robert G Weiss; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Stuber Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Sato; M Yamada; H Kuroda; D Yamamoto; Y Asano; Y Inoue; K Fujii; T Kumabe Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.825