Literature DB >> 9481008

Neonatal circumcision and pain relief: current training practices.

C R Howard1, F M Howard, L C Garfunkel, E A de Blieck, M Weitzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure.
METHODS: Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74%; pediatrics 83%; family practice 72%; obstetrics 71%).
RESULTS: Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95% CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95% CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84%; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60%) to teach analgesia/anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26% of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties.
CONCLUSIONS: Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9481008     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.3.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Simpson; Jean Carstensen; Patrick Murphy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 2.  Pain management for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  A Taddio
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Trends in revision circumcision at pediatric hospitals.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jonathan C Routh; Katherine Hubert; Dionne A Graham; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.168

4.  Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  Morten Frisch; Jacob Simonsen
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing.

Authors:  Alessandro Miani; Gian Antonio Di Bernardo; Astrid Ditte Højgaard; Brian D Earp; Paul J Zak; Anne M Landau; Jørgen Hoppe; Michael Winterdahl
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  Prevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 7.  Pain relief for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  B Brady-Fryer; N Wiebe; J A Lander
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.