Literature DB >> 9480682

A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression

.   

Abstract

Reproductive skew is a measure of the way breeding is distributed among the members of an animal society or group. Up to now, explanations of patterns of skew have been limited to one particular model, which assumes that a single dominant has full control over the distribution of subordinate reproduction. If this control is incomplete or absent, however, unsanctioned breeding by subordinate females will increase the total number of young produced. Here I present a new model for the evolution of skew that considers the effect of brood size on the inclusive fitness of dominants and subordinates. By augmenting brood size, a subordinate female reduces the per capita fitness of a dominant's offspring, so the net benefits of producing young are lower for related subordinates. I consider the stable level of skew when both dominant and subordinate attempt to maximize their inclusive fitness under two conditions: (1) when the dominant is unable to anticipate that a subordinate will add to her brood; and (2) the dominant does anticipate subordinate reproduction and can respond by adjusting her own brood size. In the first case, the model predicts that reproductive skew will increase with relatedness between breeders, because related subordinates are selected to add fewer young to the dominant's brood. In the second case, the dominant's optimal response to the presence of a second breeder exaggerates the relationship between relatedness and skew: dominants should produce more young when breeding with related compared with unrelated subordinates. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9480682     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  16 in total

1.  A skew model for the evolution of sociality via manipulation: why it is better to be feared than loved.

Authors:  B J Crespi; J E Ragsdale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Are reproductive skew models evolutionarily stable?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Contrasting relatedness patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) with different alliance strategies.

Authors:  Michael Krützen; William B Sherwin; Richard C Connor; Lynne M Barré; Tom Van de Casteele; Janet Mann; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Unfavourable environment limits social conflict in Yuhina brunneiceps.

Authors:  Sheng-Feng Shen; Sandra L Vehrencamp; Rufus A Johnstone; Hsiang-Ching Chen; Shih-Fan Chan; Wen-Yi Liao; Kai-Yin Lin; Hsiao-Wei Yuan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Starving the competition: a proximate cause of reproductive skew in burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides).

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Eggert; Tobias Otte; Josef K Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Coalitions of relatives and reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs.

Authors:  R Heinsohn; P Dunn; S Legge; M Double
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A longitudinal analysis of reproductive skew in male rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Anja Widdig; Fred B Bercovitch; Wolf Jürgen Streich; Ulrike Sauermann; Peter Nürnberg; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Kin competition within groups: the offspring depreciation hypothesis.

Authors:  J Ridley; W J Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Martha J Nelson-Flower; Philip A R Hockey; Colleen O'Ryan; Sinead English; Alex M Thompson; Katharine Bradley; Rebecca Rose; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cryptic confounding compounds: A brief consideration of the influences of anthropogenic contaminants on courtship and mating behavior.

Authors:  Tomica D Blocker; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Acta Ethol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.