Literature DB >> 9479725

Comparison of pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall lifting as to hemodynamics and surgical stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

K Ninomiya1, S Kitano, T Yoshida, T Bandoh, D Baatar, T Matsumoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairments in hemodynamics during pneumoperitoneum (PP) have been noted. This study compared changes in hemodynamics and surgical stress response with PP and abdominal wall lifting (AWL) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Twenty patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were assigned to PP (n = 10) or AWL (n = 10). Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (%EF) were measured by transesophageal echocardiography. Clearances of para-aminohippurate (CPAH) and sodium thiosulfate (CSTS) were determined as measures of renal function. Levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, white cell count, and neutrophil elastase were evaluated as indicators of surgical stress.
RESULTS: In the PP group, CO, SV, and %EF were depressed significantly during pneumoperitoneum. Immediately after and 15 min after insufflation, the CPAH and CSTS were decreased by 78.0% and 73.8%, respectively. None of the hemodynamic parameters changed significantly in the AWL group. Surgical stress response was not different significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to pneumoperitoneum, AWL did not alter cardiac function or renal hemodynamics. AWL may be useful in patients with cardiovascular or renal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9479725     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  G Galizia; G Prizio; E Lieto; P Castellano; L Pelosio; V Imperatore; A Ferrara; C Pignatelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Adverse cardiovascular changes induced by positive pressure pneumoperitoneum. Possible solutions to a problem.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Ren; Yao Tong; Xi-Bing Ding; Xin Wang; Shu-Qing Jin; Xiao-Yin Niu; Xiang Zhao; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  Which intraperitoneal insufflation pressure should be used for less postoperative pain in transperitoneal laparoscopic urologic surgeries?

Authors:  Ali Akkoc; Ramazan Topaktas; Cemil Aydin; Selcuk Altin; Reha Girgin; Omer Faruk Yagli; Aykut Bugra Sentürk; Ahmet Metin
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 7.  Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aruparayil; W Bolton; A Mishra; L Bains; J Gnanaraj; R King; T Ensor; N King; D Jayne; B Shinkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.